Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 335885094382469122


2017-07-15 15:10:48 UTC  

and if it works there its screwed elsewhere

2017-07-15 15:11:13 UTC  

🤔

2017-07-15 15:13:00 UTC  

I'm taking the scientists side on this one

2017-07-15 15:14:01 UTC  

the thing that bothers me is that some people want a solution right now, we've only been knowing that we're having a devastating impact on the earth for what, 50 years now?

2017-07-15 15:14:20 UTC  

And with the rise of easier modes of crowdfunding I think it's a question of time

2017-07-15 15:14:32 UTC  

>using disgusting outdated versions of energy creation

2017-07-15 15:14:38 UTC  

>there is no sulotion

2017-07-15 15:14:41 UTC  

solution

2017-07-15 15:14:52 UTC  

make an actual argument, I don't like this implying shit

2017-07-15 15:17:32 UTC  

If I'm reading it correct you simply want to stop using these ''outdated'' industry right?

2017-07-15 15:18:22 UTC  

I'd rather use them now and focus on developing new and more efficient industries, will have much less an impact on people, which is something environmentalists don't put very high imo

2017-07-15 15:46:42 UTC  

greetings

2017-07-15 17:00:18 UTC  

I read Stirner and for me was basically an insight on people without morals and made me question what I follow, having the answers was just a quick reflection.
But yeap, at least the memes are good

2017-07-15 18:00:16 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308995540782284817/335843022841577473/FB_IMG_1499993709481.jpg

2017-07-15 18:00:27 UTC  

Are you despooked?

2017-07-15 18:01:17 UTC  

And did you read the English translation

2017-07-15 19:34:44 UTC  

Haha

2017-07-15 19:35:19 UTC  

Marxis critiques of Stirner were semi literate nonsense

2017-07-15 19:35:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308995540782284817/335867113073803274/20170709_213316.JPG

2017-07-15 20:46:51 UTC  

New copypasta tbh ^

2017-07-15 20:47:26 UTC  

>idealistic theoretical masturbation
>is a marxist

2017-07-15 20:47:29 UTC  

😅

2017-07-15 20:47:37 UTC  

I think both marx and stirner contribute

2017-07-15 20:47:59 UTC  

Ok well now you're just being wrong @Deleted User

2017-07-15 20:48:17 UTC  

Literally using the arguments a capitalist would use against marxism against me

2017-07-15 20:48:23 UTC  

Marx is known for his materialism

2017-07-15 20:48:29 UTC  

Sociology is pseudoscience

2017-07-15 20:48:31 UTC  

Sorry

2017-07-15 20:48:37 UTC  

Epic

2017-07-15 20:48:47 UTC  

Not an argument

2017-07-15 20:49:07 UTC  

sociology is shit tbh

2017-07-15 20:49:17 UTC  

Which of marx's works did you read? And which of stirners?

2017-07-15 20:50:01 UTC  

*That which is presented with no evidence, can be dismissed with no evidence*

2017-07-15 20:50:21 UTC  

Economics doesn't claim to be a science

2017-07-15 20:50:26 UTC  

Because *it's not*

2017-07-15 20:50:36 UTC  

And psychology is a diverse subject

2017-07-15 20:50:54 UTC  

human psychology can be put to use in therapy at least

2017-07-15 20:50:57 UTC  

Sounds like someone doesn't understand the definition of science

2017-07-15 20:51:05 UTC  

"the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment."

2017-07-15 20:51:38 UTC  

Social science is pseudo science

2017-07-15 20:51:56 UTC  

Social sciences are widely accepted in the STEM field