Message from @Timo)))
Discord ID: 335802279217332231
Example ?
I don't even like stirner but the memes are okay
Well, in Belgium we don't talk a lot of him.
he's been very overlooked in history, only lately he's been getting a revival
I've read his book but that's all.
>north sea
>viable coral
do not.
that is not a thing
and if it works there its screwed elsewhere
🤔
I'm taking the scientists side on this one
the thing that bothers me is that some people want a solution right now, we've only been knowing that we're having a devastating impact on the earth for what, 50 years now?
And with the rise of easier modes of crowdfunding I think it's a question of time
>using disgusting outdated versions of energy creation
>there is no sulotion
solution
make an actual argument, I don't like this implying shit
If I'm reading it correct you simply want to stop using these ''outdated'' industry right?
I'd rather use them now and focus on developing new and more efficient industries, will have much less an impact on people, which is something environmentalists don't put very high imo
greetings
I read Stirner and for me was basically an insight on people without morals and made me question what I follow, having the answers was just a quick reflection.
But yeap, at least the memes are good
Are you despooked?
And did you read the English translation
Haha
Marxis critiques of Stirner were semi literate nonsense
New copypasta tbh ^
>idealistic theoretical masturbation
>is a marxist
😅
I think both marx and stirner contribute
Ok well now you're just being wrong @Deleted User
Literally using the arguments a capitalist would use against marxism against me
Marx is known for his materialism
Sociology is pseudoscience
Sorry
Epic
Not an argument
sociology is shit tbh