I don't even like stirner but the memes are okay

Well, in Belgium we don't talk a lot of him.

he's been very overlooked in history, only lately he's been getting a revival

I've read his book but that's all.

>north sea

>viable coral

do not.

that is not a thing

and if it works there its screwed elsewhere

🤔

I'm taking the scientists side on this one

the thing that bothers me is that some people want a solution right now, we've only been knowing that we're having a devastating impact on the earth for what, 50 years now?

And with the rise of easier modes of crowdfunding I think it's a question of time

>using disgusting outdated versions of energy creation

>there is no sulotion

solution

make an actual argument, I don't like this implying shit

If I'm reading it correct you simply want to stop using these ''outdated'' industry right?

I'd rather use them now and focus on developing new and more efficient industries, will have much less an impact on people, which is something environmentalists don't put very high imo

greetings

I read Stirner and for me was basically an insight on people without morals and made me question what I follow, having the answers was just a quick reflection.
But yeap, at least the memes are good

Are you despooked?

And did you read the English translation

Haha

Marxis critiques of Stirner were semi literate nonsense

New copypasta tbh ^

>idealistic theoretical masturbation
>is a marxist

😅

I think both marx and stirner contribute

Ok well now you're just being wrong @Deleted User

Literally using the arguments a capitalist would use against marxism against me

Marx is known for his materialism

Sociology is pseudoscience

Sorry

Epic

Not an argument

sociology is shit tbh

Which of marx's works did you read? And which of stirners?

*That which is presented with no evidence, can be dismissed with no evidence*