I read Stirner and for me was basically an insight on people without morals and made me question what I follow, having the answers was just a quick reflection.
But yeap, at least the memes are good

Are you despooked?

And did you read the English translation

Haha

Marxis critiques of Stirner were semi literate nonsense

New copypasta tbh ^

>idealistic theoretical masturbation
>is a marxist

😅

I think both marx and stirner contribute

Ok well now you're just being wrong @Deleted User

Literally using the arguments a capitalist would use against marxism against me

Marx is known for his materialism

Sociology is pseudoscience

Sorry

Epic

Not an argument

sociology is shit tbh

Which of marx's works did you read? And which of stirners?

*That which is presented with no evidence, can be dismissed with no evidence*

Economics doesn't claim to be a science

Because *it's not*

And psychology is a diverse subject

human psychology can be put to use in therapy at least

Sounds like someone doesn't understand the definition of science

"the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment."

Social science is pseudo science

Social sciences are widely accepted in the STEM field

first of all you need to take a breather, you cuss every other word, baboon

what's your issue?

I'm betting he's american, the word science has different implications here

And saying we'd be eating rats without social science is somehow adding to any discussion

you think that's an actual argument?

Name me something you can do with sociology in this day and age

It's contributing evidence of social scientists functionality and benifits

And what is it that social scientists do that benefits humanity?

Urban planning, human geography

Urban planning? how?

We did it fine before social scientists

I don't see anything concrete you can do there