Message from @Adarsh Balak
Discord ID: 421724005192433670
it is possible that i drove them away with anti-statist rhetoric
at least the more active ML users
Used to be a pretty anti Communist Anarchist
Anti Communist in the sense anti ML/MLM
But then it was the marxist concept of dialectical and historical materialism that convinced me to be a statist if not a pure ML commie
I like how this server doesn't have any visible roles
Not even mods/regulars
@Adarsh Balak Hello. ML here. Can you please formulate the question differently so I have a better understanding.
And even if the stalinist did oppose them
@Adarsh Balak Stalin was supporting anarchists with guns and powder.
I'm sure there were reasons based in ML theory
Marxist in Spain mostly been willing to work with syndicalists. But syndicalists often rejected the help due to ideological reasons.
After a time more organized, Marxist groups start winning local fights and anarchists losing. In that time anarchists lost a lot of power in the region and Marxist groups gained more.
Anarchists started to rebel against Marxists groups.
Including POUM?
The problem is they lost power and consider it as a betrayal.
All because they are not used to take responsibility of their actions.
@Adarsh Balak I don't know much details.
And yet he found reason to blame the MLs
But I guess Orwell and materialism didn't go well enough
All of them fought alongside when Marxist groups had no power yet. After they gain some everybody start to freak out a bit.
I thought the Marxists themselves had a split
Between the trotskyists and MLs
This split is always happening. Is happening all the time. Science of Marxism has nothing in common with situational and populist power gain tactics of Trotskiests
That is why we have to split before major events. Trotskyists and mensheviks will betray in the most important moment.
responsibility for what actions?
@alines for being disorganized, losing ground, losing in a war, losing power and influence.
decentralized != disorganized
losing ground to advances by former republican allies, losing the war because of intervention by republicans, losing power and influence, once again, because of republicans
they attacked the anarchist movement
spanish republicans are traitors
Do you see the difference with Marxist groups? When in 41-43 USSR been losing ground it didn't blame the Fascist. We say **WE** were not prepared. **WE** failed to defend. **WE** lost ground due to our misery and underdevelopment. Anarchists are never to blame themselves because they do not take responsibility of anything.
because we were doing well.
before the republican government attacked the anarchists, the anarchists were the most decisive opponents to franco's movement.
then all of a sudden it became our fault?
please
When was it ever your fault? <:caring:312066184948350976>
franco almost lost because of the anarchists and the poum
he won because of the republicans
He won because overwhelming foreign aid and the Soviet union essentially killing the revolutionary fervor
They were counter-revolutionary in spain by all accounts and essentially hijacked the civil war.