As well as economic class

Machines are coldly logical. Population growth will cause them to make the only logical decision. There is no such thing as post scarcity, as long as there are growing populations there will always be a struggle for resources

Industrialized nations have a neutral population flux

^ yuh

If the whole world was industrialized and lived in comfort then population would eventually even out

At least based on the data we have from every nation that had ever industrialized

Americus

Ai will not advance that fast

global economic disaster will first speed up the decay of capitalism

fascism solves nothing at that point so

Food production has a maximum level, the earth does not have enough resources to support the population of the Earth if every nation can produce surpluses. In the short term there will be massive population growth but it is unsustainable in the long run

we have enough food production to feed 1.8 times the population

Then we can expand outwards

Then we better spread out

space colonization is plausible

long term

AI's growth is exponential, it is highly likely that we will see AI capable of handling the macro economy

Make the red planet red! <:HammerAndSickle:575369911690461207>

um

No that wont come for a while

also not to mention the population is leveling off

We still have the same base problem though of population growth and climate change. Do we just keep spreading and using up every resource until we all starve?

Population growth isn't an issue, the population is leveling out

No

Climate change is gonna cause mass genocide

AI, while incredibly useful, will cause a greater change to the global economy than the industrial revolution and it will come a million times faster and harder

We face our population issues when they arise

Like any other issue

By then its too late

We don't just lay down and give up

Impending economic collapse and climate change is going to be the cause of mass genocide

it will cause the decline of capital

Well given the fact that we consume living material, it seems like a high increase in our population could be supplemented through advanced agricultural methods. There is no cap to the amount of food we can make, at least as far as I know

^

Who controls the capital is irrelevant. It is the mode of production that will cause global problems, mainly industrial/tech based industries

Imagine a global dust bowl, that is the result of permanent mass agricultural production

The dust bowl was the result of poor methods. We don’t just have dust bowls annually

We also don't need to produce that much food relatively speaking. In a hundred years much of the coastal population will move inward and impede on agricultural production. For the land that is used, it will have to be constantly used at maximum capacity

This will inevitably cause soil degradation, and later mass starvation

Weren't you talking about communism being superstitious because communists estimate a lot

<:ThinkingPepe:552577932699238400>