Message from @Im_Just_a_Chair
Discord ID: 622439229061857321
ok virgin
do u remember jonathan joestar was killed??
he needs NoFap
I wish to add to what you've said though. By culture we're talking about a spiritual organism with a life and spirit of its own; biology is secondary as whilst our nation springs from a common stock, and we van attest a likeness to one another, we can also assert those who don't have our spirit, who may share the whiteness of our skin but reject our culture. Likewise we can assert those who do in fact share our spirit who can assimilate. Then you get some buffoon who shall object, appealing only to a biological view, happy to adopt any culture he pleases it would seem, who will say "you're a civic nationalist". But a civic nation isn't defined by its culture, but a political identity built around shared citizenship. (It is absurd to speak of this outside America, though Americanisation has had its effects.) This is contrary to what we believe because we reject all modes of multiculturalism, instead being you may consider radical assimilationists. There is no such thing as an Aryan of blood. Aryan is essentially a spiritual conception. One can go even so far as to say that it is even only reflected in the three higher caste, with the fourth caste -workers - being more concerned with immediate physical needs..i.e food and shelter.
Things were different once upon a time for the Fascists. Their political doctrine was essentially man as a spiritual being. This was before they were influenced by the Nazis anti-traditional excesses (which btw led to the dominance of the leftist forces in the modern world) whose view was unquestionably materialistic with its appeals to Darwinism and the concept of the Jew vs Aryan in some racial struggle. Furthermore, we reject the obsessive Jewish paranoia recognising that whilst they are indeed foreigners/aliens, they like all other foreigners, would pose no threat to us in the first place of our spirit had been strong enough in the first place, united, with class co-operation among our peoples. These days the overwhelming majority of people will say National Socialism is Fascism, just a German view of it. Really... And what about the conservative revolutionary movement that existed alongside Hitler at the same time? Clowns like Iron March have promoted a generation of these mongrels, and people continue to repeat their folly.
Whilst fascism in my mind was an imperfect political doctrine theoretically (I would point to its collectivism, defense of totalitarianism and its hyper-focus on the state instead of the principles reflecting man's tragic condition and need for transcendence) and was let down in practice (as in Italy corporatism was not employed effectively as it ought to have been), there was enough traditional elements within it to lead it in the right direction if enough people were minded to achieve it. It is a shame because in practice the Italian people at that time did not live up to that. There weren't enough competent men surrounding Mussolini. He found himself isolated.
CRINGE
BASED
I wanted to continue on what I was saying before.
Before I was interrupted of course
On the third point of the abolition of all rights of inheritance.
@Cúchulainn
what you said
it is to prevent rich people passing down wealth without any requirement for actually working
I mean it is intended for that, but hardly ends up that way.
For some reason the existing communist party end up kinda like a bourgeoise party rather than for the people.
Wealth has rarely ever been equitably distributed.
There are so many ideologically problems here in itself that I don't understand where it can end.
Also who has the right decide over your wealth, your uncle or aunt or the State.
And is it necessary they will be just, if the say so.
Not to mention enforcement and not due to the wishes of all people but a select few who represent the people, to justify people themselves. Makes it contradict what it stands for.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
quite self explanatory, you can see totalitarian aspect yourself.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Wasn't it the banks that start much of the problems, also doesn't it seem a little fishy?
Also a monopoly, you can practically see the results there.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
Well isn't that nice?
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Seems like one rule party to me
Fat cheeked bitches who Refuse stop eat shouldnt Be accepted
They should be Penetrated in ALL. Phat area as punishment of Eat Refusal
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Equal liability, it shows that Marx has never worked in his whole life, to say something like that.
Equality liability for equal work? Is such thing as equal work?
Or just equal liability, of equal enslavement.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
no problems here at least.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.
Agree with abolition of child labour but free education all? on whose expense?
Only if the Communist party pays for it all, unlike the Capitalist system which makes us work for it.
Tldr
What are you trying to answer anyways
Lole
you are dead sir
X
Why can I still feel my heart then
Checkmate
you have an attention span of a three year old child