@Bambino <#484515645258596369>

Nah it's a reference image

For my discussion

But I'll remove it if you want

Not sure what u r referencing

Long story

You dont have to remove it

All good

Demon, you can look at a star tonight and come back next year same day and time and the star will be in the same place

So saying accelerating upward is a good model for gravity, well that doesnt work.

Nor does the heliocentric model work

good evening citizen

@bjhenderson1 stop that

uwu

Sup in here

wassup

!mute @Dick Goddard name

<:XMARK6:403540169992568833> You cannot mute someone already muted.

"A Search for Roche's Rifle"
*"A Rifle Has Been Returned"*

***hm***

Well stars do move.

They just move quite slowly

they move *extremely* slowly

you'll notice movement if you stare for a couple of decades

within the span of a human life the stars will move (from our perspective) so little that it is basically unnoticeable

well yes

star trails need to be taken into account, obviously

i am referring to their positions within these star trails

What's the gay agenda?

More gays, I guess? IDK? I find the idea of a gay agenda already questionable

Why?

@Jondar02

To be gay is to just be attracted by the same sex, why would there be an agenda behind it?

You can influence someone's sexuality

I think that's what it is all about

Can you?

i think its seen as an attack on heterosexuality

Why is it an attack? I see absolutely nothing wrong with it

idk,

maybe more gays = less straights

I don't know what the gay agenda is so someone explain it

And you can influence it, yes