I am pro gmos. Anyone want to debate?

Anyone wanna debate gravity? If so, why do things fall?

And who named me einsteins wife >:( I kinda like it :3

I guess hitler's dad and albert have something in common

So anyone wanna debate gravity?

Anyone wanna explain what pulls things down?

@Seeker of Truth how to I get verified

Lovely

That would be amazing. It would help alot in one of the servers I am mod in

Yeah. like a cut and repaste to a new channel

Globe earther

Oh hex yeah my real name is demon. This just my nick :)

Aaaaa

Idk what a mainstream or truther or any of that is so i just picked a random

🤔

Is a truther like someone that wants to spread their belief and knowlege?

That is a famous thought experiment from quantum mechanics

@Seeker of Truth three evidences are the octans and that their visibility. Second is spherical geometry with triangles becoming geodesics. Third is gyroscopes and them detecting 15 degree per hour drift.

Did I pass?

One of the main flat earthers bob noodle tried and detected it. 15 degrees time 24 hours is 360. Which is a full circle

Thanks

Ban

@Seeker of Truth I will also explain my best proof of the three. Triangles angles always add up to 180 degrees. The only exception to this is on a sphere. This is because when you create the straight lines needed to create a triangle, they actual curve because they are dilated into geodesics because of the earths curve. The angles dont add up to 180 degrees, which can only happen on a sphere. This is what we observe on earth

This only works over large distances though

Well alright. For starters lunar eclipses. The moon would have to go on the oter side of the earth to cast a shadow. And sun sets. A spotlight cant do that

Ill respond with any other questions later gtg

@Rudi I've been getting that answer quite often recently. But the globe model has an explanation. I doubt some answer of perfection is just going to come out of no where

And I do know about the buoyancy model, which can't cause gravitational time dilation or make any accurate predictions

There are 2 main answers i get for gravity, Universal Acceleration and Density/Buoyancy. As for UA, it can't explain the weight differentiations of objects at high altitudes.

For those of you who don't know, Universal Acceleration is the idea that the reason things fall down on flat earth is because of the world accelerating upwards at a constant rate of 9.8 meters per second^2.

Si senior. One of the smartest flat earthers that I've ever met uses UA though.

I think UA is the better of the two since it has the equivalence principle on its side and completely copies gravity from local reference frames.

Or at least the effect of gravity

@✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧ how does gravity as density explain dravitational time dilation?

What happened to sheeple

@danny why do u think things fall?

^^^^^^^

@danny why do u think things fall mate

;-;

Wh... b-but the buoyancy equation requires gravity

Further more, why woulds things fall down if gravity was actually just buoyancy? Why not up?

Ad hom

Ad hom not just to him, but all globies ;-;'

Well anyway, I havent seen any flat earthers explain phenomena like gravitational time dilation or lensing with relative density before 🤷

@Akhanyatin 97 dont believe in gr ;-; just certain aspects like geodesic deviation and the equivalence principle

And why did you say gr/sr? Secial relativity and general relativity aint the same things

Oh. Kek

I know for a fact that gr doesnt work with qm, but I didnt think it didnt work with the other forces if I remember right. Grand unified theory fixed all those issues and stuff I think.

Refraction.

Just ignore that

On most fe models other planets are spheres. They think the world is flat since the world can sustain life, therefore it is unique. Therefore it somehow has special properties that make it flat

Why do you think they lied about moon landing

Well it has no resistance aside from gravity, so it is allowed to flow freely

;-;

So did you look at nasa's yt channel recently

They are planning to

Go back to the

Moon

Well that could be explained. Neil lives in new york where there is a lot of light polution in the sky, so it is harder for him to see the stars and other things in the sky

I will give you a link for the space belt

Link me.

A vid of that

U know what I like? Links. They would be amazing rn

^

I agree. Operation fishbowl aint fake news

Ok... and by it being from wikipedia it it is clearly known info. So why is it a problem on globe model? It aint.

@PhumoZTYPE no you gotta listen to what he is saying

It is able to protect agianst the photons

Ergo the radiation would not be felt

Inb4 wave particle duality.

<:uh_duhh:583617741684998154>

<:giggle:485714802123997184>

<:bahahaha:485147430740951041>

<:b_:507995503397699585> <:a_:507995510624354305> <:n_:507995520724369431>

<:snapsnap:484956825863585792>

oi

How do I get verified

what do i go to become a verified globie

oh ok

Well if any regulator or stabalizers are seeing this, interview me

ok

Well my three proofs are geodesics with spherical geometry, the octans constellation and seismology

@Deleted User aye mate i heard of an interview of some sort to become a verfied globie. am i supposed to have an interview with you or what idk

@rivenator12113 oye lad what is that

@Ozgamerboy aye lad calm down

I agree

xd

quite good

lol
Dr: Good Good
me: Quite Good
Cube: Terrible

Gey

Jesus.

It's too big

hAHa

https://youtu.be/RB3g6mXLEKk

Bible contradictions

6

And a half