Message from @CryptoCypher
Discord ID: 643930076353921110
I wasn't looking for glass
You just disporovved one of your previous points
I was looking for fuselage windows
I never claimed glass
it would seem however that you've been thinking glass this whole time and you're now realising it isn't
seemingly invalidating your own claims in the process too
IT said GLASS
And my claims apply to any transparent material
I use using glass as an example
in one of the two examples cited, yes!
And youve said glass as well
You only posted 1
there were two within the quoted section
first one of which was talking about glass
second of which didn't specify the material
`c. Creep. The change in dimension of a material under load over a period of time, not
including the initial instantaneous elastic deformation. The time dependent part of strain
resulting from an applied stress.`
we can safely assume that isn't glass though
for the fact that glass shatters
Where is the link for that source
hold on
page 2, section 4
Of what?
the pdf I linked to with the quote above
Your moving the goal post and it's driving me nuts
which goal post have I moved?
I had to prove their was no non linear deformation of the light
Now I have to prove that under static stress
If the deformation was enough to cause a sigficant and acknowledgable deformation to the light you would have died flying the airplane
I wouldn't say that was moving the goal posts tbh. there's the issue of the shape of the windows but additionally there's the stresses involved with the changes of internal air pressure to compensate for the changes to the external air pressure. it's not moving goal posts so much as the fact that there's other factors which need to be included
The other factors are negligible
And are therefore ignored
the document cited mentions the stresses as well as the myriad materials selected for the inclusion within the aircraft. but you do need to show proof of this neglibility
If they weren't negligible they would've included them in this beautiful source of you
Yours
as well as the proof to your claim that it doesn't cause distortion
I told you a simple experiment you could peform
That is proof
it has been said by others, possibly yourself, that curvature has been witnessed through aircraft windows, so, we need to establish whether that's as a result of these windows or as a result of actual earth curvature
your simple experiment uses the wrong materials and that wouldn't be very scientific
I was debating laws of optics