It shatters

they don't use glass in fuselage windows

it's plexiglass

because glass would shatter

obviously

Then why would you use a source talking about deformations in the structure of glass

and it's lighter

As proof

I wasn't looking for glass

You just disporovved one of your previous points

I was looking for fuselage windows

I never claimed glass

it would seem however that you've been thinking glass this whole time and you're now realising it isn't

seemingly invalidating your own claims in the process too

IT said GLASS

And my claims apply to any transparent material

I use using glass as an example

in one of the two examples cited, yes!

And youve said glass as well

You only posted 1

there were two within the quoted section

first one of which was talking about glass

second of which didn't specify the material

`c. Creep. The change in dimension of a material under load over a period of time, not
including the initial instantaneous elastic deformation. The time dependent part of strain
resulting from an applied stress.`

we can safely assume that isn't glass though

for the fact that glass shatters

Where is the link for that source

hold on

I think I still have that tab open

page 2, section 4

Of what?

the pdf I linked to with the quote above

Your moving the goal post and it's driving me nuts

which goal post have I moved?

I had to prove their was no non linear deformation of the light

Now I have to prove that under static stress

If the deformation was enough to cause a sigficant and acknowledgable deformation to the light you would have died flying the airplane

I wouldn't say that was moving the goal posts tbh. there's the issue of the shape of the windows but additionally there's the stresses involved with the changes of internal air pressure to compensate for the changes to the external air pressure. it's not moving goal posts so much as the fact that there's other factors which need to be included

The other factors are negligible

And are therefore ignored

the document cited mentions the stresses as well as the myriad materials selected for the inclusion within the aircraft. but you do need to show proof of this neglibility