Message from @catman
Discord ID: 643929459644301338
not the same at all
That's the properties we are stesting
Testing
it's not the same material, it's not going to give an equivalency at all
Ugg
Glass doesn't deform from pressure
It shatters
they don't use glass in fuselage windows
it's plexiglass
because glass would shatter
obviously
Then why would you use a source talking about deformations in the structure of glass
and it's lighter
As proof
I wasn't looking for glass
You just disporovved one of your previous points
I was looking for fuselage windows
I never claimed glass
it would seem however that you've been thinking glass this whole time and you're now realising it isn't
seemingly invalidating your own claims in the process too
And my claims apply to any transparent material
I use using glass as an example
in one of the two examples cited, yes!
And youve said glass as well
You only posted 1
there were two within the quoted section
first one of which was talking about glass
second of which didn't specify the material
`c. Creep. The change in dimension of a material under load over a period of time, not
including the initial instantaneous elastic deformation. The time dependent part of strain
resulting from an applied stress.`
we can safely assume that isn't glass though
for the fact that glass shatters
Where is the link for that source
hold on
I think I still have that tab open
page 2, section 4
Of what?
the pdf I linked to with the quote above
Your moving the goal post and it's driving me nuts
which goal post have I moved?
I had to prove their was no non linear deformation of the light