Put it in a box

not a good enough substitute

It's translucent and deforms with change in pressurr

not the same at all

That's the properties we are stesting

Testing

it's not the same material, it's not going to give an equivalency at all

Ugg

Glass doesn't deform from pressure

It shatters

they don't use glass in fuselage windows

it's plexiglass

because glass would shatter

obviously

Then why would you use a source talking about deformations in the structure of glass

and it's lighter

As proof

I wasn't looking for glass

You just disporovved one of your previous points

I was looking for fuselage windows

I never claimed glass

it would seem however that you've been thinking glass this whole time and you're now realising it isn't

seemingly invalidating your own claims in the process too

IT said GLASS

And my claims apply to any transparent material

I use using glass as an example

in one of the two examples cited, yes!

And youve said glass as well

You only posted 1

there were two within the quoted section

first one of which was talking about glass

second of which didn't specify the material

`c. Creep. The change in dimension of a material under load over a period of time, not
including the initial instantaneous elastic deformation. The time dependent part of strain
resulting from an applied stress.`

we can safely assume that isn't glass though

for the fact that glass shatters

Where is the link for that source

hold on

I think I still have that tab open

page 2, section 4

Of what?

the pdf I linked to with the quote above