"— increase the diversity of the newsroom, thereby increasing the number of people among the staff who have experienced such abuse and antagonism"

this motherfucker right here

I wonder what response he would get if he presented this in a room of ordinary people

What the hell

Are they fucking serious?

can you imagine this fuckstick in a room full of ordinary americans, 30% of whom have probably served in the military, saying "we need to take care of our journalists who get PTSD from online bullying because people attack their work for no apparent reason"

He looks like a cuck

What the fuck

So much soy

This nigtard said that?

Fuck man

Gonna go to the nearest Starbucks and enjoy some soy lates

This guy is @✿ Mittens ✿ idol, no wonder @✿ Mittens ✿ loves being a soyfuck boy

He probably sounds like mittens

we need more victims in the newsroom guys

https://twitter.com/Gavin_McInnes/status/942853726867476482

That

oh ffs

whyyyyyyyyyyy

I mash enter when I hit the ' key

THAT ' S
even more stupid when you consider someone could actually just be yelling out 'Britain first' without them actually meaning to refer to a fringe political party

HMMM I WONDER WHAT % OF DETROIT IS BLACK

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Detroit#Table

OH, 82.69%

and they elected a Black President to help them out

"The move was welcomed by those advocating for improved gender balance in the male-dominated top ranks of tech and VC firms. "This is a great way to have the private and public sector partnering to advance diversity," said Jodi Kovitz, founder of #movethedial, a Toronto organization dedicated to fixing the gender gap in Canadian tech."

I think, mr (((kovitz))) what you mean to say is, "This is a great way to have the public sector _force_ the private sector to advance an agenda that noone can prove has any positive effects on productivity."

it's effectively a $400 million diversity tax

except, I didn't include the salaries of the nutjobs they'll have to hire, or their potential negative effects on companies productivity

Wasnt the reason they did not test the kits because that wouldnt prove anything if the man argued it was consensual sex?

yes, and probably many other good reasons as well - it's like "we can just increase the rigorousness of our vetting process for immigrants, and then we can let in people from yemen"

a "rape kit" is not a magic unicorn, and neither is the "vetting process"

"They just closed cases, even cases where I think they believed the victim ... They closed cases because the women had worked as prostitutes or had mental illness issues or had substance abuse."

I mean, it's a blanket statement, but I don't doubt that it happened, and I also don't doubt that these police officers - at least in some of the cases - knew what they were doing

they're probably on a first-name basis with these hookers

not to mention if the rape kit gets done at the hospital and the women does not press charges

they are still required to keep the kit for some time but will not test unless charges are brought as i understand it

yeah, this is a very complex issue, but what I initially reacted to in the story is _not_ complicated

"One of the reasons we have these untested rape kits ... and I can use Detroit as an example, 86% of our victims in these untested kits are people of color. You're not going to find too many blond-haired, blue eyed white women ... Because their kits are treated differently, their cases are solved. That's just the way it is in this country."

in a city where the population is 83% black

seems a bit dumb