Message from @franti
Discord ID: 393369045694676992
"Trump’s extraordinary intervention marked the latest escalation of diplomatic tensions over a decision that has seen the US widely criticised and isolated. It came after a day of high drama."
how can they claim it's "extraordinary", when literally the last 4 presidents have promised to do the same thing, and then simply not done it
and what is it, congress has voted almost unanimously for moving the embassy _twice_ ?
"escalation"
Yes, it's alllllllll ol' Trumpy's fault
Bonus irony is he's probably far less religious than Obama, Bush, or even Clinton and he's been the only guy to fuckin' get any of this done
Lol
#metoo
nice reaps
Homophobia... Real nice Rosie
Suprised that @✿ Mittens ✿ hasn't come in and done it's signature "hmmm love that homophobia" yet, after all it does that whenever we say something like she said
Reminds me of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgQy70_LPS4
skip to 2 min for the money shot.
The religion of peace strikes once again
Headlines say "driver had mental health issues, no terror connection"
>a history of drug use and mental illness
Doesn't sound very Islamic.
Those are the most dangerous ones
I'm not buying that unfortunately
3 days out of Christmas, bearded man with a tan employs a terrorist tactic that ISIS wants to be used, his mental health issue is that he's a fuckin Islamist
Also
Islamic terrorists do drugs and shit all the time mate, it's why they do the acts of terror. If you carry out the will of Muhammad and die a martyr your slate is wiped clean
^
Gonna wait a bit before getting my pantaloons in a twist.
First of all, was it an assault SUV?
Bless Imam Tawhidi
But, if we take the police at face value, why was a mentally ill and drug addict allowed to get behind a wheel?
Not sure if this is the driver or the guy that was filming it.
The last Car of Peace we had in Melbourne turned out to be a lunatic
who also started spouting Islamic rhetoric at his summons
the body-camera thing is fucking amazing, these retards have no idea that the position they start their argument from is an entirely flawed one
"In the three years since Michael Brown’s fatal shooting in Ferguson, police body-worn cameras have been sold to the public as a tool that would primarily deter police misconduct. One of the main selling points is the claim that the devices would have a “civilizing effect” on officers."
"Officers would behave better, the argument goes, if they knew their actions were being recorded. Camera vendors have told departments that their devices would reduce excessive uses of force and complaints against officers."
"The results raise an important question: If these benefits have not emerged, could the other claimed benefits of body-worn cameras — increased transparency, accountability and trust — also be false promises?"
you cunt
yeah, don't raise the question of whether the reason you thought body cameras were a good thing was wrong
Not bodycam, but great example of why context matters, and how using something like a bodycam increases the chance of having the full of account of events on camera:
Those bridges, always getting in the way!