I'm not even sure what to say about the 2nd part of that paragrahp

This paper is making my head hurt

The assumptions they are making are a joke

It seems the are only look at the number of posts

yeah, like I said just that sentence I quoted above had so much inherent bias there's really no need to read this bullshit unless you _want_ to do it for fun

Not even the content of the posts to quantify it

I am triggered

Where was this published?

https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2018/01/daily-chart-8?fsrc=scn/tw/te/bl/ed/

Nazistani Stats

it has been published in several german outlets as well

They dont even look at it compared to the growth of refugees

Or get a baseline of "hatecrimes" per capita

yes nor do they really verify their data in a meaningful way, like you already said

🤦

I cant even right now

I want to send this to TLDR

He would enjoy ripping this appart

I don't know who that is, but send it wherever you want

Well someone's gotta rip it apart

not in my estimation - it has already been sufficiently debunked for me

but I'm a Pleb

but if someone would _enjoy_ ripping it apart in detail, I would not oppose it :P

"I don't know who that is"

'Teal Deer' is a Youtube Skeptic who hates the term Skeptic Community and takes aim at everyone

https://youtu.be/vFF2z1X1kUY

he sounds pretty woke

I enjoy when he looks at scientific papers

but who does like the term Skeptic Community?

the people who use it in a derogatory manner

The White Pendragons

TL;DR fills too much time just reading shit.

Boring as fuck.

Ironic

"I'm going to film myself reading shit. I'm a CONTENT CREATOR."

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSMG40p6XHFTeXv5noF6Wdw

hahahah all those Corbyn gobshite Remainers

but muh Corbyn will save us

That was hilarious

lol fidget spinners the freshest porn search of 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHt9xR9lGmE