I wanted a woman to balance the atmosphere in the dept, if there had not been a suitable woman I would have had to hire another dude.

Luckily I knew someone ideal

I It should be whatever a meritocratic approach leads to. @Emoished

Because there will inevitably be some women who are better at a typical quote on quote "man's" job, for lack of a better term, it will not be 100/0

And by "man's" job I mean jobs usually with a larger percentage of men than women working in them

Also she didn't have to say yes

Here is my problem - i will use schools for an example - entering into university the universities do not just want to look at your atainment grades, but also the circumstances that you had when you atained them; So people who go to private school should (in some cases) be turned down in favior of people who have had a much more difficult upbringing yet obtained similar or maybe slighly lower grades. I would say that universities should do this because this will be a better measure of "latent talent" - rather than raw performance.

ok, but I'm talking about gender

Granted I have not made the link between gender/ ethnic diversity and economic background here - I very much acknowledge this

Why do I care how rich someones Mummy and Daddy are? I'm hiring them

Because then you will get people who are less good at the job, but have just had better "preperation" for it

I'll decide if they are good at the job or not

It's my dept

who's to say what level of education decides talent?

How well you can do on a test for example is of course influenced by their education - but it does not speak for their motivation or struggle to reach that level of education

which is what an interview is for...

but why should I have to pick someone based of where they got their education?

that's mental

Not based on; a Factor to consider, there are many factors to consider, this should be one of them

so you think employers put CVs in the bin if the candidate comes from the wrong side of the tracks?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/20/german-city-bans-new-refugees-anti-migrant-mood-increases/

did you read what i wrote?? I said it is A FACTOR not the only consideration or something like that

?

why do you think it isn't already? you are fighting for something that already exists

I was using it as an example of why you can't just hire people based on how they are in the moment

+ I guess arguing for why it should exist as it does

Yes I can

can hire whoever I prefer tbh

i dont care about you as an individual

oh you want to make rules so I and everyone else have to hire who you want me to

your not gunna start a company

just gunna tell us what to do

<:sargon_punch:382980735327535114>

??? Yea sure you can ascribe beliefs to me that I dont have

https://i.redd.it/0bf8gulibxbz.png

@Deleted User is a dipshit neocuck

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Neo cuck 4 life

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/cathy-newman-abuse-channel-4-jordan-peterson-metoo-backlash-latest-a8170031.html

"But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson."

"“Got ya,” Peterson said when Newman fell silent for a few seconds. Peterson laughed. The joke was on her, in a way. No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications. Especially in 2018."

"There is no doubt that Peterson was intelligent, determined and quick. No doubt, indeed, that the Channel 4 News interview was entertaining. But his words, on closer inspection, were vacuous and confusing, and he left gaps."