Message from @Broo TulsiGang 2024 🇬🇧 🇺🇸
Discord ID: 404693006613086228
Because then you will get people who are less good at the job, but have just had better "preperation" for it
I'll decide if they are good at the job or not
It's my dept
who's to say what level of education decides talent?
How well you can do on a test for example is of course influenced by their education - but it does not speak for their motivation or struggle to reach that level of education
which is what an interview is for...
but why should I have to pick someone based of where they got their education?
that's mental
Not based on; a Factor to consider, there are many factors to consider, this should be one of them
so you think employers put CVs in the bin if the candidate comes from the wrong side of the tracks?
did you read what i wrote?? I said it is A FACTOR not the only consideration or something like that
?
why do you think it isn't already? you are fighting for something that already exists
I was using it as an example of why you can't just hire people based on how they are in the moment
+ I guess arguing for why it should exist as it does
Yes I can
can hire whoever I prefer tbh
i dont care about you as an individual
oh you want to make rules so I and everyone else have to hire who you want me to
just gunna tell us what to do
<:sargon_punch:382980735327535114>
??? Yea sure you can ascribe beliefs to me that I dont have
@Deleted User is a dipshit neocuck
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Neo cuck 4 life
"But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson."
"“Got ya,” Peterson said when Newman fell silent for a few seconds. Peterson laughed. The joke was on her, in a way. No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications. Especially in 2018."
"There is no doubt that Peterson was intelligent, determined and quick. No doubt, indeed, that the Channel 4 News interview was entertaining. But his words, on closer inspection, were vacuous and confusing, and he left gaps."
if anyone has a rocket launcher, I'd like to borrow it so I can fire it in the independents general direction
It's current year! 2018 year of women not asking questions
"More about: #MeToo, Jordan Peterson, Cathy Newman, Misogyny"
articles tags
Let's face it she's a woman she should have easily beaten a man, even if he is a Professor
this one is very subtle, so I'm going to paste it again
"But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson."
I think 100% of the comments on that article are negative towards it and the "journalist"