Oy vey, this black goy is clearly right. listen and believe, goyim!

Well if it's above ground it's probably not armed, but I still wouldn't fuck with it

Someone probably left it there during a training exercise

na we left right away we reported it to the base and they said they would deal with it,

i assume your right about it being a training mine

it still scared me shitless we were cutting down pines when we found it

the thinkery's newest video almost killed me via cringe aids, why sargon, why.

Nigs gonna nig

If anyone uses Google Assistant: if you're going to search for "sax horse", don't switch the words around.

also a "shirt dress" is not the same thing as a "dress shirt"

@flyingfoxel It might have been an actual mine, but if it was above ground there's no reason for it to have had a live fuze in it.

@banestrum on public land?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjqF0N0nt_Y

not sure why but i dislike crowder.

Shit, they refused to provide security.

Well, you're an uncultured swine.

😛

thats true

He's going to do a Change My Mind live.

idk maybe it's cause the first time i seen him it was him making an ass of himself on JRE

He does sound like a loud idiot sometimes, yes.

But watch the Change My Mind videos, you'll get a change of heart.

@flyingfoxel idk how it works where you live, but around here somtimes military units use public land for training, usually just maneuvers, but they bring equipment that gets left behind sometimes

I remember there was a minor issue when some National guard reservist left his bayonet in a tree in a national park

well i hope that is what was happening

i like having legs,

Hey, not all mines are meant for killing your legs

thanks

If it was a good size it might have been anti vehicle

So you could drive a car over it and be fine

@Baraban @Werlf https://imgur.com/a/o2yIY#CArsARc

Yesterday you wanted me to go there

Yes

I myself didnt know that they were this much of jew haters

Thats why I pinged you

@Baraban modern anti-Semitism really began with the Rhineland Massacres during the First Crusade led by Peter the Hermit and Count Emicho. Before then, Jews and Christians in Europe lived well together more or less. When the massacres began, many Christians in Speyer, Worms, and Mainz (including the Church leaders there) protected their Jewish neighbors.

The reason anti-Semitism began and didn't end here was because the memory of the events lived on. Jews and Christians of Europe remembered the events that occurred. As the Crusades continued, a somewhat unified Christian conscience emerged throughout Europe. Thus, instead of blaming other Christians for needlessly massacring the Jews of the Rhineland, various reasons were created as to why the Jews there should have been killed. These included charges of deicide, host desecration, and being a fifth column of Muslims within Europe.

From here, anti-Semitism became ingrained within streams of European culture, but morphed along the way as European culture evolved. Blood libel, well poisoning, greediness, media and financial control, claims Jews secretly controlled the world, Judeo-masonism, Judeo-Bolshevism, etc. all developed as canards against Jews as time went on and other canards became less applicable (well poisoning made sense during the plague, but not as much in the 19th century for example).

While anti-Semitism is not solely due to the Rhineland Massacres, much of what has transpired in the following 850 years up to the Holocaust and beyond can be partially traced back to them and the ex post facto justifications provided in their wake.

these questions let responders play out their wild fantasies but absolutely don't signal any willingness to move further than daydreaming

So you would be safe visiting

@franti THE (((UKRAINIANS)))

<:sargoy:382978736053551104>

I wasn't scared