Here are some articles that explain how the exculpatory evidence that was obtained changed the circumstances of Michael Flynn’s prosecution.

https://www.npr.org/2020/04/30/848179290/judge-unseals-documents-related-to-michael-flynns-fbi-interview https://www.npr.org/2020/05/08/852582068/mike-flynn-pleaded-guilty-why-is-the-justice-department-dropping-the-charges https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/495366-something-seems-rotten-in-flynns-case-and-maybe-others-too https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15997/michael-flynn-innocent

https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status/1348411800572764160

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qUgPpUIjF34&feature=emb_title

Flynn was backchanneling with Russia and lied to the FBI. He belonged in jail. 10X worse than what Obama did that the right freaked out about

https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2021/01/video-clearly-shows-rep-mike-nearman-helping-right-wing-demonstrators-breach-oregon-capitol.html?outputType=amp

Hey.... well done. Thanks. I will take a look. Also.... NPR is one of my absolute favorite sources... they do very little editorializing and opining (and when they do they make it clear that is what they are doing - they don't write an article in a slanted way and pretend it just the facts)

Backchanneling with Russia? there is absolutely no proof or substance to that. He talked to the Russian ambassador, in public.

While I am looking can you tell me what exactly you would like me to take from those articles?

It was recorded. He was secretly talking with Russia behind Obama’s back telling them not to worry about the sanctions for interfering with the election. This wasn’t in public and he lied about it.

As the article says they wanted to get him off on a technicality not because he didn’t do the things.

Hmm this is a conspiracy started from when trump first begin to run

It’s all come together

Oh you're talking about the phone call. Yeah that happened. And what's illegal about it?

You realize that this is completely standard right for an incoming administration to talk to other countries?

Undermining the sitting president behind his back is frowned upon. Lying to the FBI is illegal.

Exactly, there was nothing illegal or wrong about what he did. The FBI went in there to trap him and they succeeded.

The same way people get wrapped up in murder charges because they can't remember where they were 2 years prior

They were not trying to trap him they were trying to find out if there was anything to the Russia scandal and he lied to their face 😂

They read him word for word what was said from the transcript and he flat denied it

The FBI just wanted him to explain himself they were shocked he just said nope I never made these promises to Russia

They literally went in there with a perjury trap plan. The unsealed documents even showed them discussing it.

"get him to lie, so we can get him fired"

What’s the trap? Here is what you said do you deny it? Omg what a trap.

Reading word for word sentences recorded from a phone call is not a trap. A trap is when you are vague and try to trick them 😂

Just cancelled my prime membership. Bye fuckers!

Mainly that the additional evidence that was obtained undermines the substance of the original charge and Flynn’s original guilty plea.

Oh no Bezos will only have 181 billion 999999950 dollars

Ok so I will address it as best I can after reading through all that
1) It is not clear to me if Flynn knew by pleading guilty they would not prosecute his son. It is 100% inappropriate for a prosecutor to attempt to get a Defendant to plead guilty (even if they really are guilty) by suggesting if they don't plead a family member will get charged. - So again, not certain that Flynn was put in that position directly but if he was then his plea should have been thrown out and gone to trial.

2) No one really seems to be disputing that Flynn gave false answers to the FBI in the interview. Even Barr seems clear that he did "lie". But the Barr's Justice Department position has changed and is now stating that Flynn was not in danger of being compromised by the Russians and as such he shouldn't of been charged.
* I absolutely disagree here. I understand that Team Trump (of which Bill Barr is Captain) wants to make ties to Russia a hoax, its simply not. The ties are there, the ties are many and for Trump the ties go back decades.

3) The hand written notes that were disclosed. I had forgotten about those but I do recall reading it back when it happened. They can be read in a way to make it look very bad to the prosecutors/FBI - I agree. BUT, they can also be read in a way that favors them as it appears the final "decision" was not to play any games and do it by the book.

So - this is what it sounds like on that issue - They seem to know that Flynn is about to lie to them regarding his Russian contacts (or that he has lied to them in the past and they are not trying to get that lie on the record). So like with any type investigation they make a plan, decide the goal and how best to reach that goal.
I would hope that getting to the Truth is always the goal. But in this situation there were National security implications. So if they just get him to admit the truth they might then lose out on the ability to charge him criminally or get him out of a position of power. Why is it important to get him out of that position ? - Well, we don't want our National Security Director primed to be compromised by Russians - so I do not have any trouble with them having this conversation about how to proceed giving the importance of the matter - And the fact they decide to not play games seals the deal for me. I think that part was fine.

Have to have something to bit%& about since the mainstream news won't cover antifa counter protest/ riot
https://trends.gab.com/item/5ffb4c5b0f426b6bf309a8ff

An immaterial recollection error is not the same thing as “lying to the FBI”, and the evidence supports the former. There was no underlying crime, so their whole prosecution turned on treating an immaterial misstatement as a crime itself. That’s one hell of a stretch that “no reasonable prosecutor” would pursue.

There is no Russian collusion connection. That has never been established. How did you reach that conclusion?

defund amazon

Social media platforms are the new form of communication, they should be declared a public channel of communication and abide by the same laws radio and cellphone provides abide by.

They say Millitary moving around in places

Who's they??? Please provide a link(s)...

Shit coming out and it’s gona be beautiful only time can tell

Yep... I've been hearing that for 10 weeks.

This guy