That's false, they had started doing this last year later in the year.

Some of my leftist friends are. They think it’s wrong but literally they don’t care.

It's also something they'd be legally liable for if they didn't take it off their site.

What are you referring to? Antifa/BLM accounts that organized and/or spread the info of organized protests/riots?

Think if you worked at google and you DIDN’T shut off services to small businesses owned by conservatives so they can be absorbed by large leftist corporations. What are you even useful for?

Ones inciting violence were eventually taken down yes, it's still something in the process because Twitter is literally legally liable to remove the content from their platform.

Criminally liable at that.

So how do conservatives gain a voice without being constantly censored?

Facebook does not follow their own rules, or common sense, like you think.

“Inciting violence” is obviously subjective. It can range from literal demands for violence to mere calls to action for protest. And it’s the latter kind that’s being abused right now.

Then report them to the police if they don't take down the messages, simple.

Or the FBI.

You are correct many of the libs i know dont care that we are censored

That would be the correct thing to do yes. But I remember twice reporting a child pornographer casting children for a movie on Facebook, and twice they refused to take the post down. So Facebook in no way is a benign organization of rules.

Then take it to law enforcement, this is how you escalate. Also you could be wrong, who knows?

Blockchain solution. Charles Hoskinson is dedicated to providing a solution on his platform cardano.

I mean, I've said I cared and disagree many times, as have other people here.

> So how do conservatives gain a voice without being constantly censored?
@angelula There is plenty of voice. I cite this very discussion as an example.

So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.

Is that a solution? As we’ve seen with Parler, every type of vendor/service can be pressured by the oligarchs to drop a company.

> So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Nope. As long as it's not radical violence.

It seems to be yes. Trying to shutdown a blockchain is a pretty monumental task and so far I don’t believe any country has been able to do so.

They should just invoke religious reasons. Checkmate.

Not true. You don’t have to actually instigate the violence. For conservatives, we have strict liability with regards to protests.

Big tech censors conservatives voices who never advocated violence.

This to me is purely a counter cultural clash. There are millions who believe our society is evil. To me we need a cultural solution to that. In my mind it means taking back the cultural institutions from liberals. This is something we can no longer ignore.

I'm hearing the insurrection act has been signed can anybody verify?

Been hearing that daily for 9 weeks. Not betting on it.

@Zuluzeit what did the Vatican do?

"Take back the cultural institutions from the libs." This will help, surely.

If only the president had a way to communicate with his country.

@Zuluzeit allegedly

Well if he uses the emergency broadcast system and annoys literally everyone in the country, I imagine he'll alienate himself into a corner further.

But he can still do press conferences.

That’s not what I was referring to exactly. They would have to own or control all aspects of their service/business. i.e. email, cell phone, legal representation, payroll service, etc.

I think the federal workforce is one of the biggest cultural pillars that needs reform.

... why?

> @Zuluzeit allegedly
@busillis Not exactly sure. I tuned out when it was clear that it was a recycled amalgamation of a bunch of the more silly ones.

I think the last person that did that went down as the most racist, most damaging president in US history. Might want to be careful with that.

Because the people who have jobs in the important parts of government generally can't be fired and generally they are very liberal.

They know how to speed up or slow down the buerocracy

Oh, so fire the libs.