Message from @Maw
Discord ID: 797944519969865748
Nothing of tangible substance. The oligarchs aren’t confident in Parler’s moderation of content.
They do take posts down if they are inciting violence though as far as I’m aware...
Which is why their reason is not one of tangible substance.
The point is to establish a precedent and establish themselves as the new government of the US. They can effectively write legislation and enforce it via the power of their infrastructure.
I wish it was even a little hyperbolic but it’s not.
This is true sedition.
I still have a fb account. On there the message is parlor allowed terrorist communications that cause the capitol riots. So that's what we're working with here.
The sedition term being thrown around is dangerous
There’s literally nothing stopping the cartel of big tech from telling your local shoe store to pay their employees $100 per hour or else get their internet shut off so they can be absorbed by Amazon.
That’s right, any form of resistance from conservatives is now a terrorist act.
Except the rioters used all platforms, specifically Facebook groups. That said, they never purged BLM/Antifa accounts nor their prominent supporters despite the widespread violence they’ve perpetrated for months.
Trump could’ve easily done the same to antifa and BLM, but instead Biden in concert with big tech will be doing it to anyone not on board with their one party system.
I mean are people stupid enough to not see the contradictions?
@angelula, you just advanced to level 1!
That's false, they had started doing this last year later in the year.
Some of my leftist friends are. They think it’s wrong but literally they don’t care.
It's also something they'd be legally liable for if they didn't take it off their site.
What are you referring to? Antifa/BLM accounts that organized and/or spread the info of organized protests/riots?
Think if you worked at google and you DIDN’T shut off services to small businesses owned by conservatives so they can be absorbed by large leftist corporations. What are you even useful for?
Ones inciting violence were eventually taken down yes, it's still something in the process because Twitter is literally legally liable to remove the content from their platform.
So how do conservatives gain a voice without being constantly censored?
Facebook does not follow their own rules, or common sense, like you think.
“Inciting violence” is obviously subjective. It can range from literal demands for violence to mere calls to action for protest. And it’s the latter kind that’s being abused right now.
Then report them to the police if they don't take down the messages, simple.
Or the FBI.
You are correct many of the libs i know dont care that we are censored
That would be the correct thing to do yes. But I remember twice reporting a child pornographer casting children for a movie on Facebook, and twice they refused to take the post down. So Facebook in no way is a benign organization of rules.
Then take it to law enforcement, this is how you escalate. Also you could be wrong, who knows?
Blockchain solution. Charles Hoskinson is dedicated to providing a solution on his platform cardano.
I mean, I've said I cared and disagree many times, as have other people here.
> So how do conservatives gain a voice without being constantly censored?
@angelula There is plenty of voice. I cite this very discussion as an example.
So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.
Is that a solution? As we’ve seen with Parler, every type of vendor/service can be pressured by the oligarchs to drop a company.
> So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Nope. As long as it's not radical violence.
It seems to be yes. Trying to shutdown a blockchain is a pretty monumental task and so far I don’t believe any country has been able to do so.
They should just invoke religious reasons. Checkmate.
Not true. You don’t have to actually instigate the violence. For conservatives, we have strict liability with regards to protests.
Big tech censors conservatives voices who never advocated violence.
This to me is purely a counter cultural clash. There are millions who believe our society is evil. To me we need a cultural solution to that. In my mind it means taking back the cultural institutions from liberals. This is something we can no longer ignore.
I'm hearing the insurrection act has been signed can anybody verify?