Then take it to law enforcement, this is how you escalate. Also you could be wrong, who knows?

Blockchain solution. Charles Hoskinson is dedicated to providing a solution on his platform cardano.

I mean, I've said I cared and disagree many times, as have other people here.

> So how do conservatives gain a voice without being constantly censored?
@angelula There is plenty of voice. I cite this very discussion as an example.

So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.

Is that a solution? As we’ve seen with Parler, every type of vendor/service can be pressured by the oligarchs to drop a company.

> So we can have conversations, so long as none of us emerge as a leader with any sort of a following.
@AdvanceManExtraordinaire Nope. As long as it's not radical violence.

It seems to be yes. Trying to shutdown a blockchain is a pretty monumental task and so far I don’t believe any country has been able to do so.

They should just invoke religious reasons. Checkmate.

Not true. You don’t have to actually instigate the violence. For conservatives, we have strict liability with regards to protests.

Big tech censors conservatives voices who never advocated violence.

This to me is purely a counter cultural clash. There are millions who believe our society is evil. To me we need a cultural solution to that. In my mind it means taking back the cultural institutions from liberals. This is something we can no longer ignore.

I'm hearing the insurrection act has been signed can anybody verify?

Been hearing that daily for 9 weeks. Not betting on it.

@Zuluzeit what did the Vatican do?

"Take back the cultural institutions from the libs." This will help, surely.

If only the president had a way to communicate with his country.

@Zuluzeit allegedly

Well if he uses the emergency broadcast system and annoys literally everyone in the country, I imagine he'll alienate himself into a corner further.

But he can still do press conferences.

That’s not what I was referring to exactly. They would have to own or control all aspects of their service/business. i.e. email, cell phone, legal representation, payroll service, etc.

I think the federal workforce is one of the biggest cultural pillars that needs reform.

... why?

> @Zuluzeit allegedly
@busillis Not exactly sure. I tuned out when it was clear that it was a recycled amalgamation of a bunch of the more silly ones.

I think the last person that did that went down as the most racist, most damaging president in US history. Might want to be careful with that.

Because the people who have jobs in the important parts of government generally can't be fired and generally they are very liberal.

They know how to speed up or slow down the buerocracy

Oh, so fire the libs.

got it.

No not saying that

All of these services will soon be available on a blockchain solution like cardano. Likely a few years away but that is something to look forward to thankfully.

The pillars of government need to be apolitical

Right...

@Zuluzeit so it's the CIA MI6 the Vatican extraterrestrials ? And who else?

@Zuluzeit so much for keeping it simple.

> @Zuluzeit so it's the CIA MI6 the Vatican extraterrestrials ? And who else?
@busillis Pancho Villa and Delta Force. Probably more. My tiny mind can't grasp how deep this goes.

I'm just saying its very difficult to get a clear under performer in government out the door. Some times that underperformance is on purpose

OMFG

If Pancho Villa's involved clearly this is been in the works for quite some time.

He has 2 belts of usb drives and I see no poll observers. Case closed.

There is - or at least was - a very large segment of Federal Employees who are apolitical. Its important that we have these people in high enough roles to ensure the necessary jobs get done and get done correctly. Some examples of this are fairly high level career employees at the Justice Department, NSA, GSA ad others. Unfortunately, Trump has decided to attack those people as well, labeling them the "deep state" if they ever dare to be loyal to the country as opposed to him.