wow

how homophobic of you

Your last few responses to me seem to be suggesting I am of a position which I am not and you could not logically assume from my statements.

Not once did I say or suggest that democracies should not hold their people scared. I mean.... "We the People...." come one.... of course the people are scared in this system.

Its a system of self governance..... the power that the "government" hold was given to the "government" by "The People"

So "We the People" are the core of this Democratic Republic.

I would really appreciate it if you would stop incorrectly stating my positions for me. If you feel you are confused on what I meant, then by all means ask and I will clarify

I’m not homophobic I have no problem with those terrorists patriotically circlejerking each other. I just don’t think being in the capital killing people was a good choice for venue

How the fuck is that homophobic?

woah chill with the kinkshaming bigotry

Corporations pulling support for gop candidates that supported insurrection and fake fraud claims delicious. It’s going to be a fun midterms

Let me clarify. If you are not willing to defend small businesses from violent rioters with the same vigor as the Capitol building, then I would say you hold the Capitol building as a more sacred building worthy of better protection than private businesses they are intended to serve.

"kinkshaming"? Are you now implying that Homosexuality is a "kink"? Because that actually WOULD be a Homophobic statement.

Ok... and who do think is opposed to that position?

Probably me and a small percentage of Americans.

I do find it hypocritical though.

I agree with this. If the issue is with the system then take it out on the system. Not the people that the group claims to defend or protect.

So wait... you are opposed to defending small businesses from violent rioters? Or is this just a sliding scale where you put property damage of a walmart on the same level as an attack on the Capitol prohibiting those in it from doing their Constitutionally mandated job?

Small businesses were defended with far more violence and arrests though. You are pretending they did nothing 😂

?

not one unarmed protestor was shot by police

only in the capitol building

The protestors in the capital were armed

yeah they had two arms

the woman who was shot was unarmed

all the people around the woman was unarmed

Unarmed and breaking into a room with citizens to let armed violent mob in

Sounds like a real winner

Their constitutionally mandated job is no more important than the local jeweler that sells jewelry to put food on their table. I am saying that if it’s an act of terrorism to riot on the Capitol building for political reasons, then it’s equally a terrorist stack to riot on the jewelers store for political reasons.

@Dedkraken any unarmed protestors get shot by police while doing their looting? nope

Government: *shoots rioter in cold blood *

Biden: “everyone knows if this were BLM it would be much worse”

They arrested hundreds and attacked many more

The only thing that has stopped BLM mass murder is not doing something like breaking into the capital

“Cold blood” lol wtf

You guys make lots of excuses for terrorists

And you're playing into it. They know.

Ok George w Bush

lol

2020 was not that long ago. We all unfortunately remember the way terrorists were received.

I don’t think you have ever received factual info about events to remember

Any act of violence or threat thereof in order to alter the policy of a Government is... by definition... an act of terrorism.

So again, you keep making statements in a manner that I disagree with the statement.

Violence for political reasons is terrorism.

But... the point that I was making and that you did not address was that a walmart super center is simply not as important to our democracy in both ideology and fact.

Congress does not meet and vote on matters such as certifying the presidential election in the fucking Pet Supplies area of Walmart.

Terrorism exists in all political persuasions. It is also not always unjustifiable. Were Iraqis who had their families blown up by American bombs justified in committing acts of terrorism? Were the founding fathers justified in committing acts of terrorism against the British government? There is more nuance to terrorism than people are comfortable with.

Yes it is important to keep people safe while performing their Democratic duties, but it is NOT more important than keeping pet supplies employees safe while earning a living.

even merkel is critcizing these actions

MERKEL