Message from @Jacob
Discord ID: 519333367301275649
https://www.cis.org/Report/63-NonCitizen-Households-Access-Welfare-Programs
New data dropped on immigrant welfare usage
Christmas fair best.
Ren fair questionable
State fair smelly.
County fair good if girl has agrarian appreciation
Antique fairs are top fair
Never been to one.
Scroll half way down the study and you’ll see welfare rates broken out by race
We just missed the November one here. Next one in July.
For your red pill folders
@Asatru Artist - MD We have a lot of research we're still sorting through. I have finals now so I'm doing too much per day, but once Winter Break starts I'll get the autism flowing
That's a good video on immigration
@MPI - VA If you have a redpill folder you're in for some good stuff because I'm working on a massive curated list of immigration research plus other projects
I tried using the Center for Immigration Studies on my sjw sister and she said it doesn't count because it's a right-wing think tank and biased
If you guys want some arguments right now, you should listen to my immigration immigration speech that I gave my pubic speaking class.
@Isabella Locke-MT If you want, I can get you alternative sources to cite
If anyone wants citations on any immigration related topic, I'm your guy
I will take you up on that later
I like these hard stats for when liberals begin their condescending demands that we prove the sky is blue right after having spoken in platitudes or having quoted the lamestream media and subversive academics
Negative information about immigration is right wing therefore all think tanks and studies which produce data other than 'immigrants are rainbows and unicorns' are right wing
I've seen a few based youtube videos where they gave liberal actors some facts on immigration to read lol
the actors didn't know what they were getting themselves into
Absolutely. We need both emotions and facts. @TylerHess
https://twitter.com/RadioFreeTom/status/1069396212741222400?s=19
True Conservatives are incredibly based.
@missliterallywho Yes, it's generally not ideal to cite right wing think tanks directly. However, if you dig far enough, there is a lot of evidence that comes from "neutral" sources
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/09/trump-clinton-immigration-economy-unemployment-jobs-214216
This is the article I recommend that everyone read. George Borjas is great because he's a Harvard economist, and his takes are pretty nuanced. He's not really "anti" immigration, however, what he says generally favors restrictions.
This article in particular is written in very simple language and is a good introduction.
https://gborjas.org
This is his blog, which has some more advanced writting on it. A lot of it is still pretty easy to understand, though.
@Nemets so the dotted line means non human? How come it comes from the "human" bubble though?
https://gborjas.org/2016/09/21/a-users-guide-to-the-2016-nas-immigration-report/
This is a pretty good guide to the 2016 NAS report on immigration. He explains the implications of the report so you don't have to read the whole thing yourself, and, if you get into an argument, you can just cite the report.
For immigration’s economics, read George Borjas. For immigration’s cultural impacts, read Robert Putnam. For immigration’s history, read Peter Brimelow. For current immigration politics, read Daniel Horowitz. For left wing criticism of immigration, read Jefferson Cowie and Angela Nagle.
That should fully cover you in the issue. Feel free to message me for more.
Jacob recommended him too
Liberals don't like Borjas because he's an "outlier" when it comes to economists, however, he has good explanations for why the other economists are wrong, so you can pretty easily shut down that argument.
@Nemets I would have thought it was the Khoi who would have that profile. In older schemes they were considered the most archaic humans and I think wiki still says that
@MPI - VA Putnam is good to read, however, it's important to be prepared for when liberals try to say that "that's just one study" or whatever
Bantus are the biggest movers in SA though so maybe it doesn't matter that they aren't human if they are pushing out Khoi and Whites. Truly Bantus are the superior lifeform.
The replication rates for Putnam's work aren't perfect, however, (1) there is much more research showing negative than positive effects of diversity, and (2) the studies that don't replicate his conclusion have shitty methodologies, like using kitchen sink regressions