Message from @zaley rose
Discord ID: 785964989219471380
thats debatable, and a whole different discussion.
It is a VERY crucial balance
@Wardog they can be AMAZING parents but certain characteristics need to be filled by a mom and or dad
For pubic adoptions I agree they shouldn't discriminate based on sexual orientation but some places also want to force the private christian foster organizations to allow gay adoption. That's a gray line I can see both sides of. It's not preventing gays from adopting public or from other adoption groups just not that particular religious one. However, it also limits the child's options.
so a little less than half of all first marriages end in divorce. thats some of the highest in history, is it not? that doesnt seem incredibly stable in my opinion. Im not attacking your point, but just because a couple is straight doesnt mean they are more stable than a gay couple.
I personally lean on the side of religious freedom when choosing who can adopt but I think in most cases the child is technically still a ward of the state so the alternative has merit.
i'm incline to disagree. usually gay couples (and i'm strictly talking lesbian/gay, not the non-binary stuffs), would have one in a slightly more "masculine" attitude and the other in a slightly more "feminine" attitude.
It doesnt matter what you follow, what you believe, what you identify as... all that matters is who you are and if you would be able to properly take care of a child in my opinion.
that is true. though its something the SJW gays dont like talking about, there is very often a more masculine and feminine partner in the relationship. those are more successful relationships as well within that demographic.
absolutely agree. i'd like to see legal cutting/reform to allow easier adoption for those that are financially and emotionally ready and want to adopt
hey, the left wants more social workers and stuff like that... we could have more... but instead of replacing the police, we just have them vetting couples or individuals who want to adopt. more jobs, more adoptions, less kids in adoption hell.
lmao deregulate adoption
They make good parents but when it comes to the child's mental health it is proven that kids with a mom and a dad are less likely to commit suicide
is that "kids with a mom and a dad instead of a single parent" or "kids with a mom and a dad instead of a dad and a dad or a mom and a mom" ?
I think one way to encourage adoption is if more companies included adoption benefits like they do maternity leave. I read some stats about that at one point and it's a low cost thing for companies to offer because most won't ever use it while for those that do, it allows more people to adopt by covering the fees.
because I feel like its probably the first one. if you have a source for it, please, change my mind (:
I like that David, thats a good idea.
i've started adopting the attitude of "less social workers = better society" after i learnt that socialism/communism uses social workers to disrupt relationships and overburden more bureaucracy/wasting money
you know what, that might be true. doesnt seem implausible. ill give you that one... and I have seen some bad shit before in that regard. but idk. im not sure if thats really the majority of what they do.
What I'm talking about is even if someone is a lgptq+ parent the kid needs a father figure or a motherly figure in their life
that's a good idea that companies could try out
well, one way to cut down costs/regulations is cutting down bureaucracy. so if we ever reach a point where anybody cares to reform foster system, i suspect whoever spearhead the initiative to go through all the admins fluffs and started cutting down levels whose responsibilities overlapped with each other
I hate bureaucracy.
also, not to dampen people's mood, the modern trend is smaller households, and less kids are being born or exist at all in the family, so i think there will be less adoptions overall in the future?
This is why I like our community everyone is up for discussion even is we slightly disagree
tell me about it <:KEK:726877368601411624> democracy dies in bureaucracy
Once a job is created in government, it's almost impossible to get rid of. Just look at USPS and why they are so far in debt and it's not the cost to ship.
goddamn it. stop shaming usps. they're essential service to our election integrity!
This is what sets us apart, and what makes this a actually nice place to be. Keep defying those stereotypes leftists label us as. Truth is truth.
@isoboto I don't really think so... many kids are being privately adopted everyday... because its actually more affordable
really? i hope so. the trend nowaday is "no marriage, independent people". so i was a bit worried
another trend is "dont have kids because they are bad for the environment and cause global warming REEEEE"
fuckin leftists...
I wish virtue signaling leftist would domestically adopt rather than internationally. It's still a good thing that they are adopting these kids, but there are so many in our country that need a parent you don't have to look to Africa or Asia to find a child in need.
Why just Christians??? You realize don't you that many of us oppose abortion and are not Christians, right??
^ true
but I think he meant more along the lines about what Christians believe, their morals, and what the bible s ays
thats why they need to be rready to adopt.
lollllll i was going through John Ward's old video and stumbled upon a gem where a mother was telling her followers not to have babies anymore and encourage abortion......with her daughter sitting right next to her
fuck I think ive seen that one before, or a similar one.... its actually even more sad that theres enough to get them mixed up.......