If 1800s-1900s have that much controversy (Specifically those who idolize individuals too much), how much more controversial events will we have in the 2000s?

I have always found 1940s-1970s a fascinating period of history, allbeit quite recent

Yes.
It is interesting, and it is a bait for controversies, since the Cold War was running then.

Most things involving the Soviets are controversial, namely Holodomor, the Great Purge, Berlin Wall, Iron Curtain, etc.

Lmao we have Native American ruins though

19-21st century had a million wars

Up to now

Press F to pay respects to JFK

It's been exactly 57 years since he was killed

F

F

F

*presses F and farts at the same time* Whoops

i thought he was killed on the 22nd.

Also time zones

On March 4, 1941 two British commando units and one demolition squad raided the Lofoten islands in Norway. They successfully landed and completed their objectives without a shot being fired while taking over two hundred prisoner. One of the raiders couldn’t help but use the local post office to send a telegram to A. Hitler. The telegram read “Reference your last speech I thought you said that whenever British troops land on the continent of Europe German soldiers will face them well where are they.”

saame

the pics used to creep me out as a kid

Aren't there also Republican Presidents?

Do you think if Donald Trump got shot while giving a speech, he would continue to give the speech until he was done, like Teddy Roosevelt?

maybe? not sure

In 1777 the Green Mountain Boys fought under General Stark at the Battle of Bennington. Its green field represented their name and the thirteen white stars a tribute to the thirteen colonies. Flags are awesome!

historic

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYflQ7vEiEQ&feature=youtu.be

Does anyone know what Jainism is and what sky-clad walkers are?

And what Ashima is because I need this for history

Bruh

Janism is a asian religion

It’s where the nazi symbol comes from

Mhm

Would you consider Britannica.com a non biased source for history? I'm thinking of subscribing to it for writing references

very interesting

Slavic migration never happened btw

I'mma just post something I saw from quora that I thought was very interesting

Lets say there were one million or 3 million settling on the Balkans from the North\Poland\White Russia, did they travel on foot without maps. for 100–200 days all on different roads? Did they have food for up to 3.000.000 people to travel for 100 days? Did they carry 50 killograms of food each? And had to look for watter every night? Did they take the old and also those who did not want to migrate?

If Poland\Russia could produce one year in advace food for millions slavic migrants THEN WHY MOVE from there??? You will be rich if your neighbour leaves a farm land that can produce one year worth of food supply in advance!

1600 years ago it got also dark pretty fast. With old people and babies the travel time of the millions “slavic” settlers must have been reduced to few hours a day. Making camp’ cooking, looking for water..

There are so many funny things about the Slavic Wave Fiction (i can call it fiction = no historical source, no history!) stay tuned

see what I'm saying

https://youtu.be/hvaeAn4yqdo

This is random, but I just got done watching a video on Chinese history, and it bothers me that so many people online parrot the propaganda that the CCP fought against the Japanese in WW2. The nationalists were the ones that exhausted their manpower fending of the Japanese, which is why the red army backed by the soviets were able to wipe the floor with them in the Chinese civil war. https://thediplomat.com/2014/09/the-ccp-didnt-fight-imperial-japan-the-kmt-did

I heard before that the communists used the war to conserve strength until they could reignite the civil war

It seems they had a token presence on the frontline to fool the KMT