by that he wouldn't be able to claim either

Cite your source big guy

monarchy of France lost their way and abused their power <:sad:366743316475281408>

the revolution was a bad idea, but it was inevitable

citation: The treaty of Utrecht lmao

I'm assuming you're not gonna take the wiki

Yeah

Thats why he cant inherit Spain

lemme slow this down for you

He is of the branch of French successors.

Philip V renounced all claims to the FRENCH throne

he is of Philip V's line

Keep it civil, ladies. <:really:453005408064241674>

therefore

he has no claim to the French throne

Kingfish is correct but it really doesn't matter. France is not going to revert to monarchy in the foreseeable future.

I think if it's anyone it would be Henri d’Orléans

@Kingfish The crown is not the personal property of the King and thus he cannot alter the line of succession by abdication or renunciation.

Yes he literally can

he did

at the Treaty of Utrecht

@Kingfish Yeah that is invalid.

it happened

according to who lmao

it wasn't invalid for any of the European powers

it stood as the law for over 300 years

now it's invalid?

It was done to end endless wars in Europe not to dethrone the rightfully monarch.

He wasn't dethroned

he was King of Spain

Yeah they are all dethroned now

>arguing about European rule instead of discussing about how we fix our own countries issues. <:really:453005408064241674>

okay?

and?

yeah they are

doesn't change the laws

Which wasnt the original intent.

doesn't matter what intent was LOL

They are all pretenders.

he renounced ALL legal claims to the FRENCH throne by himself and his heirs to the end of time

that was agreed upon and signed into law by all European powers