Message from @busillis
Discord ID: 795777717890580510
Yes. That is exactly what it is.... Which is why I say its a problem
Look... the reality is that the 600 to 2000 Stimulus Increase Bill would have passed the Senate if for no other reason than Senators would have had no choice but to vote for it or they would lose their next election.
Trump wanted it so we know he would have signed it. The OVERWHELMING majority of Americans wanted it.
So... if not for Mitch McConnel that Bill would likely be law now.
But again... its not just Mitch. Its whoever the Senate Majority Leader is... Mitch has just been prolific at killing bills that would likely pass if allowed to go to a vote
@JD~Jordan do you think if there was a law passed which limited the length of a bill it would prevent this from happening? Im wondering if there was less to "object" to on each bill, political and public pressure would overcome the ease at which house leaders manipulate/obstruct congress
Epstien didnt do it, Hunter was framed,sleepy joe said conudity free china blueberries on the city ahhhh trunalimunumaprzure!
Everyone knows it's the orange man's fault...
@busillis, you just advanced to level 47!
I like how they're slow rolling this coup we've been hearing about for 30 years. Super shrewd.
Was this from above video?
Just a random observation. I pop in from time to time throughout the work day.
Oh hell no... that won't work. The 600 to 2000 was not "long" nor was the Minimum Wage Increase or the Equality Act.
Its just 1 guy who is now one of the richest Senators (after growing up dirt poor in KY) gets to decide what bills make it to a floor vote....
And the Corporations and Donors that pay him $100K to come speak at their luncheon are actually the ones in control
Is there a video today?
Ahhh so the capital "C" Coup that never truly materializes
There will be a stream, yes.
Cool good
Were they not thousands of pages?
Busillis what they say Donald Trump does
FYI there's a little known or used rule in the Senate that requires the reading (out loud) of any and all bills, this is almost always waived by unanimous consent (also can be waived by a motion that is voted on) but on occasion has been used to grind the Senate to a halt and these very long bills are read out loud (note unanimous consent means even one Senator can force the reading)
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/134021-senate-clerks-prepare-for-50-hour-reading-of-the1924-page-spending-bill
I had no idea.
Man the GA guy came out with all the fact and investigation that refuted every one of trumps claims
@JD~Jordan The Constitution was developed by people that had fled a country control by a king and they were looking for freedom fro that oppression. The "Forefathers" set up a constitution to insure or on the surface insure freedom. Of course we can't ignore that they had no real vision of today. Mankind always evolves and knowledge is that force. We have to adjust and adjust again. Black or Brown AMERICANS were left out despite being included. Advances were made but the veil of haves and have notes needs be lifted and changes to the constitution made to reflect our change and progress. WE ARE CREATED TO CARRY FORWARD AN EVER ADVANCING CIVILIZATION
What do you mean they had no vision of the future?
They could have no in-depth vision of where we are today. Technology, travel, internet
Thats inaccurate.
tyrants banning guns, suppressing free speech, trying to ban church gatherings, govt spying on its citizens, yeah no vision at all
vaccine travel pass???
Get back in your hole... Don't speak while the overlords speak.
forgive me dear leaders
If you look throughout history there are letters and speeches of politicians speaking of the future
I'm not your leader