According to the recording it’s a whistleblower who was involved in the whole thing.

So far we have a car mechanic , a podcaster , a temp worker that lied about her education (carone), a known conspiracy theorist (ramsland , who has no idea how voting machines work )and a Italian pizza baker. 👨‍🍳

I need to listen to the whole thing.

Audio recording of Georgia County Election Supervisor was released stating they were instructed to report their original numbers as the “hand count”, regardless of what the actual Hand count turned up.

you mean this guy supposedly hacked election machines?
https://sos.ga.gov/index.php/elections/fact_check_georgia_senate_masquerades_failed_treasure_hunter_as_hacker_and_election_security_expert

He lied. He identified traffic by a Polling Pad using a packet sniffer. He thought they had a gotcha moment, because he thought they had claimed that no equipment was connected to the Internet. He clearly says polling pad in the testimony.... Except polling pads do connect to the Internet to update voting rolls every day before the polls open.

Sure... Please provide a link.

These were the packets I was interested in. Of course turns out to be nothing. No wonder they didn’t present any of this dribble in court.

I’m guessing your “fact check” has no idea about Forensic Auditing. Your *opinion of the Forensic Auditor’s credentials is not superior to the Auditor’s professionally produced findings.

I’m talking about the sham hotel hearings. They mentioned they captured packets going to and from the machines. Turns out this wasn’t the case. No surprise. It was the most interesting part of the hotel hearsay hearings

Sure... Point me to a definition of "forensic audit" for elections.

Otherwise... YOU would have been selected to conduct the audit of the machine... and you weren’t

@deMontfort, you just advanced to level 3!

Republicans better obstruct everything. Every single thing. They better filibuster everything.

won't be a filibuster when the Dems change the rules

Good point.

You need a dictionary now @TaLoN132 ? If you don’t know, why are you commenting?

They have full control of the government now. God help us.

I do know... That's why I am asking you to provide a definition for something that was made up a few weeks ago.

Everyone who calls for “forensic audits” generally have no clue what they are asking for. I think they just like saying forensic audit

Guys, none of that matters anymore.

There’s no such thing as fraud, just tactics.

There are no rules.

if you had a dictionary you would know that the term "forensic audit" refers to accounting not elections

There are just actions.

@TaLoN132 It seems you’re not really prepared to have this discussion then.

Fraud exists... It's just not to the scale as what was claimed. Not even close. I know of only 3 arrests that have been made for election fraud this election. all small time.

There is no fraud. There are only tactics now.

“However, the Wifi capability is disabled before the poll pads are put in to use at the polling place.” So they are connected and updated everyday but their WiFi capabilities are disabled before they are put in place for use. So they remove each pad at the end of the day and then place them back in the morning?

okay then it seems advisable to stop posting here and go out and act ... let me know how it goes and maybe I'll join you ... or maybe not

Lol

If we were in a CPAs office. And if we were anywhere else... it would mean a “Forensic” “Audit”... as that applies to any in depth investigation of counting in any other profession

I’m more intelligent than that. I don’t just go nuts.

risk reduction audit is what you call it for elections and they did that in GA

Our brothers are in DC

@deMontfort they got a car mechanic who failed out of military intelligence entry level training courses https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawandcrime.com/2020-election/sydney-powells-military-intelligence-expert-witness-was-actually-an-army-mechanic-who-never-worked-in-military-intelligence-report/amp/

means you're not qualified to be in Trump's inner circle at the moment

@TaLoN132 A question. The call between Trump and Georgia, was that a settlement call?

If you say so... The reality is that "forensic" implies a scientific approach or methodology. None exists or has been established for forensically auditing voting machines. There is no manual. There is no guideline. For proof, look at the ridiculous report that Russ Ramsland's ASOG put together in Antrim Country, MI. (BTW - you should look into who Ramsland is).

A forensic audit/examination is designed to focus on reconstructing past financial transactions for a specific purpose, such as concerns of fraud, whereas an internal audit is typically focused more on compliance and/or the performance of the organization

Tomorrow we take DC