I’m guessing your “fact check” has no idea about Forensic Auditing. Your *opinion of the Forensic Auditor’s credentials is not superior to the Auditor’s professionally produced findings.

I’m talking about the sham hotel hearings. They mentioned they captured packets going to and from the machines. Turns out this wasn’t the case. No surprise. It was the most interesting part of the hotel hearsay hearings

Sure... Point me to a definition of "forensic audit" for elections.

Otherwise... YOU would have been selected to conduct the audit of the machine... and you weren’t

@deMontfort, you just advanced to level 3!

Republicans better obstruct everything. Every single thing. They better filibuster everything.

won't be a filibuster when the Dems change the rules

Good point.

You need a dictionary now @TaLoN132 ? If you don’t know, why are you commenting?

They have full control of the government now. God help us.

I do know... That's why I am asking you to provide a definition for something that was made up a few weeks ago.

Everyone who calls for “forensic audits” generally have no clue what they are asking for. I think they just like saying forensic audit

Guys, none of that matters anymore.

There’s no such thing as fraud, just tactics.

There are no rules.

if you had a dictionary you would know that the term "forensic audit" refers to accounting not elections

There are just actions.

@TaLoN132 It seems you’re not really prepared to have this discussion then.

Fraud exists... It's just not to the scale as what was claimed. Not even close. I know of only 3 arrests that have been made for election fraud this election. all small time.

There is no fraud. There are only tactics now.

“However, the Wifi capability is disabled before the poll pads are put in to use at the polling place.” So they are connected and updated everyday but their WiFi capabilities are disabled before they are put in place for use. So they remove each pad at the end of the day and then place them back in the morning?

okay then it seems advisable to stop posting here and go out and act ... let me know how it goes and maybe I'll join you ... or maybe not

Lol

If we were in a CPAs office. And if we were anywhere else... it would mean a “Forensic” “Audit”... as that applies to any in depth investigation of counting in any other profession

I’m more intelligent than that. I don’t just go nuts.

risk reduction audit is what you call it for elections and they did that in GA

Our brothers are in DC

@deMontfort they got a car mechanic who failed out of military intelligence entry level training courses https://www.google.com/amp/s/lawandcrime.com/2020-election/sydney-powells-military-intelligence-expert-witness-was-actually-an-army-mechanic-who-never-worked-in-military-intelligence-report/amp/

means you're not qualified to be in Trump's inner circle at the moment

@TaLoN132 A question. The call between Trump and Georgia, was that a settlement call?

If you say so... The reality is that "forensic" implies a scientific approach or methodology. None exists or has been established for forensically auditing voting machines. There is no manual. There is no guideline. For proof, look at the ridiculous report that Russ Ramsland's ASOG put together in Antrim Country, MI. (BTW - you should look into who Ramsland is).

A forensic audit/examination is designed to focus on reconstructing past financial transactions for a specific purpose, such as concerns of fraud, whereas an internal audit is typically focused more on compliance and/or the performance of the organization

Tomorrow we take DC

We are talking specifically about the investigation into the ballot machine’s inner workings and function. That is a “forensic” investigation to discover additional technical evidence.

google 30 seconds @TaLoN132

I'm not sure... I heard that Trump's team had made 18 other attempts to get Raffensperger on the line to bypass the courts to gain access to data that they wanted access to. Raffensperger explained why he was prevented from releasing that data, IIRC. So, Trump's team considered it a settlement call in that they were trying to preempt having to go through the courts to attain what they wanted.

?

Thank you. Seems like another spin from the Trump campaign.

No one asked you for your “professional” opinion. They hired someone with *extensive technical experience to conduct that Forensic look at the ballot machines so we don’t need to listen to your magical skills you don’t have.

A forensic audit/examination is designed to focus on reconstructing past financial transactions for a specific purpose, such as concerns of fraud, whereas an internal audit is typically focused more on compliance and/or the performance of the organization

Possibly... It might just be semantics. I think that Raffensperger and Ryan Germany took Trump's threats seriously and decided to preemptively lay their cards on the table.