Turn the term "Nazi" into the term "Internationalist".

there can be times when it's useful to discuss AIPAC

some people might even be interested in talking about Boasian anthropology or psychoanalysis if it's relevant to fields they are interested in

you don't have to mention what group is behind it though ;)

yes I think we agree

Good.

I agree as well.

If it weren't for a large number of people like the Bush family aiding and abetting it wouldn't happen.

@Jacob Here's something to get fellow whites on board: don't talk about the JQ but do name the Internationalist (((banker))).

I think it's important to acknowledge that this is a constellation a Bad actors which may be centered around a certain International Clique but is hardly limited to that group

Many huwhites are also against racial discrimination. It would be wise to point out that we are the subject of that discrimination.

In fact, take a stance against war, Internationalist bankers, and the death of the American labour movement, and we have the previous Democratic party's niche.

combine that with Isolationist rhetoric, conservatism, and protectionism, and you've got a platform to talk to your GOP kingmaker.

Socialism with nationalist qualities?

Sshhh

not out loud ;)

We can have an entirely "economic" approach to this that will undermine our enemies *and* appeal to suburban huwhites.

Here's the best part: we can make the entire debate about tax policy with both sides agreeing on immigration.

It's the same Dem vs Republican trap.

;)

A lot of people on our side don't understand the JQ

It's not supposed to be our version of systemic oppression where we blame a group for our problems. That's dumb and a loser mentality.

The JQ is about how Jews have a distinct ethnic identity. Since identity is the basis of politics, this leads to distinct political interests which don't necessarily align with our own.

It's not "Jews are bad", it's really a neutral statement. It's not a judgement in either direction.

We should probably have members infiltrate the Democratic party as well.

The way that is done is that the largest donors to both parties are the banks

@Jacob I know. However, introducing the JQ that way is going to be a bit easier if we attach it to their victim mentality.

The banks are the slow game and it takes two hundred years

@Perihelion - CA Indeed. We can use the whole "money in politics" schtick to get at them as well.

200 years is a reasonable time frame

if we get birth rates and immigration under control

Anyone who uses it to blame our problems on someone else is dumb.

Those who make excuses always fail

Indeed. However, if we attach the JQ to their "elitist banker" blame game, we can offer them a solution.

that being the full JQ.

Problem: International banker means no social change. Solution: realize who these bankers are.

Well if we want to start the banks game then we need to start saving our money and creating our own financial institutions

It's an easy sales pitch.

@Perihelion - CA Agreed.

First Bank of Evropa.

Evropan National Bank.

It's regulated to death

@Perihelion - CA That's why we talk to our GOP lawmaker.

They hate regulation.

it's also worth mentioning that rootless cosmopolitans are a problem that transcends ethnicities

there's white people who are rootless cosmopolitans too

After a market crash from subprime lending, we can start our own institutions.

@Jacob Indeed. However, we can necessarily paint those individuals as "against the poor working class".