Message from @boazzie

Discord ID: 790179867375304704


2020-12-19 19:07:09 UTC  

Are you intentionally avoiding my question? It's almost like there isn't any proof that "immigrant lovers" are publishing incorrect data, and it's just conspiratorial nonsense

2020-12-19 19:19:24 UTC  

i determined you were a deceptive retard. no, im not answering your bullshit question. stop pinging me, jackass

2020-12-19 19:53:31 UTC  

again, thats the add homosexual fallacy

2020-12-19 20:19:57 UTC  

Sorry to hear that reality doesn't correspond with your anti-Semitic conspiracies. Better luck ad hominem-ing your way through future debates

2020-12-19 20:33:55 UTC  

wow you guys are so insecure you cry "ad homosexual" every time i accurately assess your intelligence

2020-12-19 21:40:39 UTC  

"Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong"."

2020-12-19 21:41:24 UTC  

also you didnt even get the "add" part of add homosexual right

2020-12-19 21:41:32 UTC  

you cant even copy paste correctly

2020-12-20 00:35:19 UTC  

blah blah blah

2020-12-20 00:35:27 UTC  

y u care so much?

2020-12-20 00:35:33 UTC  

nothing better to do then whine on discord?

2020-12-20 00:50:28 UTC  

"Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, is a term that refers to several types of arguments, most of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to some irrelevant but often highly charged issue. The most common form of this fallacy is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong"."
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem)

2020-12-20 00:52:22 UTC  

i speak latin !!! i kno what it mean!

2020-12-20 00:52:29 UTC  

salve magister

2020-12-20 00:52:40 UTC  

tu est non credo

2020-12-20 00:52:50 UTC  

okay its been a while since latin class

2020-12-20 02:14:07 UTC  

credere?

2020-12-20 02:14:12 UTC  

crederit?

2020-12-20 02:14:20 UTC  

not sure which is 2nd person

2020-12-20 11:32:41 UTC  

credere is infinitive so it means "to believe (in)"

2020-12-20 11:33:24 UTC  

crederit is 3rd person perfect so it means "He believed (in)"

2020-12-20 11:33:38 UTC  

I think crederis is 2nd

2020-12-20 15:49:46 UTC  

i never was good at latin

2020-12-20 16:54:18 UTC  

I’m just glad I get to use it in real life for once

2020-12-21 12:13:54 UTC  

Industrial is the advantage of communism and agricultural is the disadvantage

2020-12-21 13:10:23 UTC  

Has anyone listened to an audio book called Change Agent by Daniel Suarez ?

2020-12-21 13:19:06 UTC  

its quite interesting , i recommend it
Its a story based on how a police officer named kenneth is hunting a syndicate that illegally edits genes to get desirable qualities for adults and children. Their leader, Marcus Demang Wyckes calls a hit on Kenneth as he starts to close in on him and his operation. Kenneth is stabbed with a needle which looks like it contained a serum of some sort. Kenneth faints and blacks out and wakes up in a hospital bed with restraints on with a mirror next to him revealing his appearance has been altered to look like the leader of the syndicate Marcus Wyckes

2020-12-22 00:16:46 UTC  

.

2020-12-22 01:12:13 UTC  

@lillian there exists a distinction between male and females. no amount of "but harvard says you have to love tranny11!!11" can change this. science does not get to weigh in to transcendental categories

2020-12-22 01:14:49 UTC  

no one said these distinctions don’t exist??? but according to literal research and scans of hundreds of brains, the brains of trans women behave the same way as cis women.

2020-12-22 01:14:57 UTC  

no

2020-12-22 01:15:01 UTC  

i just looked at the study

2020-12-22 01:15:04 UTC  

it doesnt say that

2020-12-22 01:15:05 UTC  

stop lying

2020-12-22 01:15:11 UTC  

it says "more like"

2020-12-22 01:15:28 UTC  

1 simple study that actually agrees w me but not entirely?

2020-12-22 01:15:31 UTC  

and i dotn agree to the terminology "trans women"

2020-12-22 01:15:40 UTC  

lets instead say "males who are confused"

2020-12-22 01:15:50 UTC  

"agrees with"

2020-12-22 01:15:50 UTC  

there’s tons of other studies that i can bring u