anyone wanna debate shit?

im free

how does one acomplish that

ight thanks

I hath returned

anyone wanna debate something?

I can go for pretty much any topic so if you have something on your mind I got you

fight me uwu (/j)

no but they have legal privliges that make it real easy for the ones that would want to (systemically target black people) to get away with more than any person should be able too

so, I think that those legal privileges that make it easy for the bad ones to get away with it should be repealed, would you agree?

not that they should have any legal kneecaping

okay leme go at this point by point

"not only against specifically black people every race in general" as far as I know BLM does stick its head out for non black victims of police injustice so that isnt really in play so to say

okay

so then why did you bring non blacks also getting the raw end of injustice up?

if BLM sticks its neck out for both whats the point of making the point?

I started by saying that its not a widespread systemic thing

okay

even if it is unlikely, why not make it impossible

leme grab an example

okay so, I cant quite remember the keywords to find what im looking for so ima make my point before I grab the example and search for it whilst we debate. is that fine?

ight

so far as I know

police get more time to prepare their statement after getting arrested than a normal person, this gives them more time to get their story strait and makes it harder to prosecute them, this makes it easier for them to get away with illegal acts since its far harder for interrogators to catch them in a lie and or unprepared (since they had time to think their story through)

I think we should take away the extra time

which would be a good start to trimming down the amount of unjust acts that police can get away with

would you agree

how so

I just said the extra time should be taken because it makes it easier for the bad ones

it has no effect on the others

I saw the unjust / just thing as the main thrust of the argument and thus the first thing I should address

as for them needing more time because they are officers of the law

how so

its just an interrogation

you tell them what happened

unless you intend to lie no extra time is needed

I shall

but

in the event its true

would you agree the extra time should be redacted

I appreciate the desire for context

but id just like to say that I dont think the point of it is to make getting the story's strait easier, just that its a real ugly side effect that justifies its cancellation.

(bad form my apology)

as in the extra time should no longer be granted

(oop sorry, turns out im a tad less free than I thought, you good to continue in 20 minutes~?

ight thanks

bac

okay so

I cant find anything about the procedure for interrogating a police officer because everything is just a bunch of shitty buzzfeed ripoffs about "your rights under interrogation" with the almost same title every time

would you mind if we switched topic?

specifically

what is your position on migration

since you identify with the republicans who are typicaly against it yet have pro immigration in your beliefs tags

by this guy you mean me or grape

I see

so

what exactly is your position on illegal immigrants

I figured that much

I meant the ones who are already here

I see

if your issue is them being here illegally

would you be opposed to offering them citizenship?

that would make them legal

and tax payers

as in you would be opposed? (should of phrased that better)

so you would not be opposed so long as they follow the laws of the united states? (or wherever they are)

well we agree

by breaking the law do you mean like, everything down to jaywalking or having permanent markers while being under 18 or just what would be considered "the serious stuff"

"basically parole for specifically illegals bc they already broke the law once" what do you mean by this?

so you think if they are arrested they should have the option of parole to avoid deportation?

okay thats uhh

thats a yikers imo

okay so norman

you believe that if they come here after deportation it should be forced labor or death yes?

"forced labor yes
deportation yes
death if they are dangerous"

so

their crime is entering here illegaly yes norman?

and the lowering of wages is the moral charge yes?

I see so

should the punishment for trespassing be forced labor or death norman?

since that is essentially what there doing

so you believe that forced labor and or death is a just punishment for the crime of trespassing as defined by the USA?

if fines are a valid substitute

why not just use fines

okay I agree

so

norman just to get this clear since I dont wanna mis-represent you

the objective is to get money from them right?

but to get money from them if they come

I see

so

would the best way to get cash from the not be

to give them citizenship and collect taxes?

okay If I may

what exactly is "the damage of them"

okay ima take this point by point

as for the crime

first generation imigrants commit less crime than their native born counterparts

this shits been studied

the one im working off