🤪

Kyle would be better off with just his Wisconsin lawyer representing him and not this Lin Wood / John Pierce sideshow. But, hey, what do I know? I'm not a lawyer. 😛

We just like to listen to them 😂

Pro hac vice

Thank you, aiva.

ouch

Please, for the love of God, Lin Wood, do not try and take over Kyle's case.

I'd be inclined to think he's some sort of undercover prosecutor if he did that.

I'd be on that conspiracy bandwagon so fast.

He can’t

If he's accepted he absolutely can from my understanding.

You can file motions for change of counsel, assuming this motion to grant the ability to practice in the state somehow goes through. (I pray it doesn't)

I surely hope Kyle is receiving legal help from people besides Lin Wood so he knows when his counsel is being ridiculous.

I can only imagine he is.

On a scale of 0 to 10 for how much I trust Lin Wood to see this case through in the best interest of Kyle, I'm sitting around a 2.

My default for public defenders is 5.

Prosecutors are 0 by default.

The fact I trust a public defender more than I do Mr. Wood should speak volumes.

His "professional demeanor" is a hard negative in the interest of Kyle.

Wood is afflicted with Avenattitis.

@Maw he’s a DEFAMATION lawyer. He is only offering that expertise

Pierce tried to file a writ of habeas corpus.

(In fact, he did file)

Pierce is primarily known for corporate litigation.

Mostly civil law from my understanding.

He's not a defense attorney.

I may have gotten mixed up with Wood and Pierce's names, but the idea is the same.

Let defense attorneys handle this, please, for the love of God.

No more ridiculous circa eighteenth/nineteenth century defenses.

yea

Pierce and Wood bring absolutely nothing to Kyle's criminal defense

like

literally nothing

a net negative, as Gary Cohen would say

lol the irony is the charges document made me think the prosecutor is an undercover defense attorney

hi

anyone for a chat !

Hi

How are you?

Energized!

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodat