Message from @realz
Discord ID: 775538641812062209
Running benfords law on 159 numbers you would not expect to see such a smooth curve imo
Maybe if it is broken down into something smaller than counties
But then he'd have a magnitude problem because benfords law only works with numbers that vary over many orders of magnitude
Either way I doubt that data is available but who knows
Either way I'm certain his claim is over 159 samples (numbers)
Ya i see. More data would be ideal
I've seen Biden Supporters on github working the data various ways and every time they apply benford's law the only irregularity is with Biden's votes
Jorgeson, Trump no one elses show the same irregularities
> I've seen Biden Supporters on github working the data various ways and every time they apply benford's law the only irregularity is with Biden's votes
@TacitusKilgore
Can you provide the links to some examples I'd love to share this with my software engineering leadership they are interested
someone have a link to the affidavit in the show?
White House Press secretary kayleigh mcenany???? tonight did you see it? not any MSM and they attacked her! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0V2CYVJJyQ
I saw it on Right Side Broadcasting
Also, about Benford's Law, I'd be interested in seeing it applied to like the 2016 or 2012 presidential elections and comparing that to the 2020 presidential election
Do you have a link @daddy Kevin ??? only place i could find it
yup
@Elias Diaz so I have a program
a note; with a uniform random distribution, the shape of the histogram is highly dependent on what the maximum number is (which actually makes sense)
and it does not converge great
lemme see if I can make a gif
naw just read the book by John Reed that was banned in the USA 60yrs
Red Illinois. Surreal.
500 samples, a bunch of instances of benford's law
159 samples
both of these are using normally distributed numbers between 0 and 19000000
how would we know?
I was just showing evidence that benford's law is dubious with such a low number of samples
Sadly,we may not but it dosnt need to be shown on that large of a level.All that needs to happen like rob said is 10's of thousands
if you can prove it
what is?
Takes time to collect evidence...President trump is on the defensive so he will always have to counter punch.
10's of thousands of votes...Id say over 300,000.
what makes you say this?
I'd like to be this convinced too
300,000 is a fairly specific threshold. How did you determine that floor?