Message from @leftingfighter33
Discord ID: 775888570933706772
Ya ive seen a couple of videos and he defenitely has a pretty hard slant to his views @WatchingYouDaily
Can biden be persecuted for breaking the hatch act? He has been talking to foreign leaders already apparently
Didn't they go after Flynn for that or something
I think that is a bunch of BS
Unconstitutional
Yup
You can't stop people from talking to foreign leaders
"Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."
That's the Logan Act wording. Do his actions go against this?
Does it really matter
If he becomes president he is immune
I would like to say yes but integrity and politics go together like oil and water.
For the aftershow
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=kILJ0_1604958232
Wouldnt play this on stream language is atrocious
https://youtu.be/jPUFwmZN9eo
@FaithJoy
Maybe yall should play corn pops video on stream for all the biden bros
Anybody see this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztu5Y5obWPk&feature=emb_title
Thanks for links
Imma watch
Lol someone send him a superchat and ask him to play the jim crow joe video, I dint wanna beg anymore but I need the salt from the Jobros
Regarding using Benford's law to determine election fraud, here's a link to a 2012 master thesis that basically says it is not that good of a test to determine fraud https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/557850/Brown_georgetown_0076M_11716.pdf
That video is interesting in that it has all sorts of other analysis but I'm not knowledgeable enough to prove or disprove
Also notable is that the guy has a very dubious claim to have invented email lol (check his wiki)
Him and Al
The tubes
Always check the history of wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shiva_Ayyadurai&oldid=624606217#Development_of_EMAIL,_ensuing_controversy
ARPANET's RFC's don't completely describe the system he's talking about. He has a number of features and UI innovations on what you might technically call "email", but in reality most users don't give a shit about.
His "email" is closer to what you actually use than the shitty UI ARPANET projects.
He didnt invent it, it wasnt even his idea, the real ones hold it down for Tomlinson
He did innovate and make it a widely useful framework
That depends on whether or not you consider what Tomlinson created to actually be email instead of text messaging with addresses or not. Most people consider email to be a subset of functionality found in outlook or gmail.
They retconned "network mail" to mean email. The adoption of those standards incorporated in the infrastructure on which email resides doesn't mean they invented email.