Message from @realz

Discord ID: 776268307284230235


2020-11-12 00:56:16 UTC  

@DisenchantedTruth I think the house also has to certify each state's votes

2020-11-12 00:56:23 UTC  

which is usually just a formality

2020-11-12 00:57:32 UTC  

Barnes talks about the various options the republicans have in theory

2020-11-12 01:18:41 UTC  

> which is usually just a formality
@realz - they don't "certify" but the votes are opened on Jan 6th in a dual session with the VP presiding.

2020-11-12 01:20:35 UTC  

@DisenchantedTruth Barnes made it sound like they have a chance to object to each state

2020-11-12 01:20:39 UTC  

and an objection goes to vote

2020-11-12 01:21:44 UTC  

Not according to the Constitution. I only know what I read in that.

2020-11-12 02:07:40 UTC  

heads up: Matt Braynard, interviewed yesterday by Jack Murphy, who is being interviewed right now live on Tim Pool is running an analysis on a mass scale

2020-11-12 02:07:59 UTC  

his organization has found 2 million high risk ballots that match dead people or moved out etc. and is calling people up

2020-11-12 02:08:34 UTC  

and has found people who don't know wtf the cast vote is

2020-11-12 02:08:40 UTC  

and is taking their testimonies

2020-11-12 02:08:55 UTC  

I don't have time to track this story down

2020-11-12 02:09:01 UTC  

but it seems ... promising?

2020-11-12 02:09:03 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2020-11-12 02:09:07 UTC  

another lead

2020-11-12 02:11:11 UTC  
2020-11-12 02:12:03 UTC  
2020-11-12 02:12:38 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq dunno how busy you are, you might find this interesting

2020-11-12 02:13:01 UTC  

I actually covered that last night I believe 🙂

2020-11-12 02:13:06 UTC  

wow nice

2020-11-12 02:13:10 UTC  

musta spaced out

2020-11-12 02:13:36 UTC  

Kind of quick, but I covered his flowchart which I thought was well done. Interesting project.

2020-11-12 02:16:00 UTC  

watching it now or listening to it while I generate a simulation of Dr. Shiva's data

2020-11-12 02:16:49 UTC  

@meglide oh that sounds interesting

2020-11-12 02:16:58 UTC  

am curious what you are doing but don't interrupt 😛

2020-11-12 02:17:08 UTC  

finish that simulation

2020-11-12 02:40:02 UTC  

it's a spreadsheet and here's a screenshot

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/776275083504779264/precent_above_below.PNG

2020-11-12 02:42:20 UTC  

essentially I assumed something like 5 percent of Dems vote for Trump and 30 percent of Reps don't vote for Trump, all Reps vote for Reps downline and no Dems vote for Reps downline

2020-11-12 02:43:16 UTC  

zoom on chart

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/776275895757307904/precent_above_below_zoom.PNG

2020-11-12 02:43:21 UTC  

I need to watch his video again

2020-11-12 02:43:49 UTC  

what is the x axis and y axis measuring

2020-11-12 02:43:52 UTC  

above/below what?

2020-11-12 02:45:15 UTC  

I'm trying to mimic his graph ... my number is a ratio of total trump votes/rep votes downline

2020-11-12 02:45:43 UTC  

the above/below is percent above or below 1.0 ratio

2020-11-12 02:46:25 UTC  

that's the y-axis

2020-11-12 02:46:46 UTC  

x-axis is percent Republican

2020-11-12 02:47:24 UTC  

got it

2020-11-12 02:48:16 UTC  

my point is that with just some simple assumptions about human voting patterns I can get a graph to mimic what he plotted

2020-11-12 02:49:38 UTC  

mmm

2020-11-12 02:51:13 UTC  

I could dynamically change the percent of Reps that defect from Trump based on how Republican the precinct is, etc. ... maybe adjust the Dems voting for Trump etc. ... probably get any kind of curve you with just a few tweaks here and there