Message from @RobertGrulerEsq

Discord ID: 776268287003852820


2020-11-12 00:37:40 UTC  

awesome!

2020-11-12 00:56:16 UTC  

@DisenchantedTruth I think the house also has to certify each state's votes

2020-11-12 00:56:23 UTC  

which is usually just a formality

2020-11-12 00:57:32 UTC  

Barnes talks about the various options the republicans have in theory

2020-11-12 01:18:41 UTC  

> which is usually just a formality
@realz - they don't "certify" but the votes are opened on Jan 6th in a dual session with the VP presiding.

2020-11-12 01:20:35 UTC  

@DisenchantedTruth Barnes made it sound like they have a chance to object to each state

2020-11-12 01:20:39 UTC  

and an objection goes to vote

2020-11-12 01:21:44 UTC  

Not according to the Constitution. I only know what I read in that.

2020-11-12 02:07:40 UTC  

heads up: Matt Braynard, interviewed yesterday by Jack Murphy, who is being interviewed right now live on Tim Pool is running an analysis on a mass scale

2020-11-12 02:07:59 UTC  

his organization has found 2 million high risk ballots that match dead people or moved out etc. and is calling people up

2020-11-12 02:08:34 UTC  

and has found people who don't know wtf the cast vote is

2020-11-12 02:08:40 UTC  

and is taking their testimonies

2020-11-12 02:08:55 UTC  

I don't have time to track this story down

2020-11-12 02:09:01 UTC  

but it seems ... promising?

2020-11-12 02:09:03 UTC  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

2020-11-12 02:09:07 UTC  

another lead

2020-11-12 02:11:11 UTC  
2020-11-12 02:12:03 UTC  
2020-11-12 02:12:38 UTC  

@RobertGrulerEsq dunno how busy you are, you might find this interesting

2020-11-12 02:13:01 UTC  

I actually covered that last night I believe 🙂

2020-11-12 02:13:06 UTC  

wow nice

2020-11-12 02:13:10 UTC  

musta spaced out

2020-11-12 02:13:36 UTC  

Kind of quick, but I covered his flowchart which I thought was well done. Interesting project.

2020-11-12 02:16:00 UTC  

watching it now or listening to it while I generate a simulation of Dr. Shiva's data

2020-11-12 02:16:49 UTC  

@meglide oh that sounds interesting

2020-11-12 02:16:58 UTC  

am curious what you are doing but don't interrupt 😛

2020-11-12 02:17:08 UTC  

finish that simulation

2020-11-12 02:40:02 UTC  

it's a spreadsheet and here's a screenshot

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/776275083504779264/precent_above_below.PNG

2020-11-12 02:42:20 UTC  

essentially I assumed something like 5 percent of Dems vote for Trump and 30 percent of Reps don't vote for Trump, all Reps vote for Reps downline and no Dems vote for Reps downline

2020-11-12 02:43:16 UTC  

zoom on chart

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201221145919499/776275895757307904/precent_above_below_zoom.PNG

2020-11-12 02:43:21 UTC  

I need to watch his video again

2020-11-12 02:43:49 UTC  

what is the x axis and y axis measuring

2020-11-12 02:43:52 UTC  

above/below what?

2020-11-12 02:45:15 UTC  

I'm trying to mimic his graph ... my number is a ratio of total trump votes/rep votes downline

2020-11-12 02:45:43 UTC  

the above/below is percent above or below 1.0 ratio

2020-11-12 02:46:25 UTC  

that's the y-axis

2020-11-12 02:46:46 UTC  

x-axis is percent Republican

2020-11-12 02:47:24 UTC  

got it

2020-11-12 02:48:16 UTC  

my point is that with just some simple assumptions about human voting patterns I can get a graph to mimic what he plotted

2020-11-12 02:49:38 UTC  

mmm