@james j, you just advanced to level 4!

The initial source of the Scytl story was a Tweet that was found in German that said that Scytl was being raided in Frankfurt. That's all it took to get the rumor mill going. The Army has denied it. Scytl has denied it saying that they don't have offices or servers in Frankfurt.

@james j Russell Ramsland signed an affidavit as part of the Lin Wood Georgia appeal, but it was rejected for standing, but I'm assuming they're appealing.

He's part of this process.

I don't think the military would raid it to begin with.

I'm pretty sure that's not how foreign relations work.

There is a long and arduous process associated with these sorts of things.

The American military doesn't just go around kicking down doors in other countries.

Also, there is misinformation about what kind of information Scytl is provided and/or stored. Scytl provides a dashboard application. It only represents aggregated/pre-tabulated data. Individual ballot data is not uploaded to Scytl.

trump has big ass but no dick 🤣 🤣 🤣

I read somewhere that Scytl had a backup server in Germany. It wouldn't have been the U.S. Army that seized it. It would have been either the CIA or an agency connected to the State Dept. They would have to coordinate and get approval from Germany. Totally possible based on my experience with the Federal government.

That process takes a fair amount of time @linuxace

So during their research Russell found that the same SSL certificate was being used for the following sites:

trumply people you lose, no more 😎

Basically if you crack one votign site, you can pretty much access any of the other ones on the list.

Lmao 'Trumply'

It's obvious their priority is not security.

If it did happen, I imagine it would have been pre-planned and worked out with Germany months ago. It sounds like many agencies were already prepped to do these things. Again, I don't know if it really happened but I don't doubt that it could get done in this time frame.

They weren't operating in a vacuum, guy.

It would likely be a raid handled by the rapid response teams from Germany and handed to the Americans.

@NoobDad wasn’t he a republican candidate for something? So far a quick read shows this evidence to not be promising

@NoobDad I am guessing that Lin Wood's GA case could only appeal the finding that he does not have standing. If he wins that appeal, I believe it would be kicked back down to the lower court for adjudication. Since he was seeking to stop or delay the certification, which happened yesterday, it is probably a moot point now.

@james j if you scroll to top, you will see they did a side by side comparison between Dallas and San antonio elections, first republican, the second predominantly democrat. They saw many more anamolies in the Republican-heavy election.

No argument that dominion systems are fairly insecure.

This is the interesting part. Here is their architecture:

Dominion voting systems do have security.

Russell admits it's simplified, but the entire network is setup so that the MEDIA can be updated in real-time

Just outdated security in some parts, and other parts improper security.

It's kind of a cool system, but they didn't address security properly

It's alarming how many states accepted this with no security standards.

It has security, it's just very poor implementation, Zulu.

Like they didn't think about it or something.

And you can verify Clarity by visiting Georgia Voting site

Likely caused by inexperienced programmers.

@NoobDad The CISA dept that Trump created in 2018 (after the elections that Ramsland's team investigated) to address these types of concerns put up a very comprehensive Rumor Control site to address these types of concerns. See https://www.cisa.gov/rumorcontrol

I wouldn't focus on the insecurity. True they are insecure but there would be different irregularities in the data if this was a result of a hack or exploit.

@linuxace, you just advanced to level 1!

> @Lady Georgia Well the EO from 2018 is real and it was directly relating to exactly what we see unfolding now...even gone over on the show here. So they were thinking about it 2 years ago...not so far fetched in light of that is it?
@RickyDigits
Not saying it's not real. Just struggling to believe it when it's not something the Trump team is even talking about. Presumably they're waiting for as extensive a report as they can before Dec 14 to submit to the courts so that it will be the court and not the executive that is seen to be defining things... if it's real.

@Lady Georgia, you just advanced to level 1!

@Maw I was going by the slide. It says 'no security standards.' Seemed an important premise.

This guy, Chris Krebs, is actually pretty impressive. They really went after trying to plug up the holes that seemed to allow potential manipulation.