Message from @james j
Discord ID: 779745455986049044
Lol
> @Lady Georgia, you just advanced to level 1!
@Watching the Watchers
What I was writing sooo much the other day, is that not counted 😅
Rank has no bearing on any sort of interaction here, so don't worry.
So in the architecture, bottom left, those companies represent all of the ballot gathering. They are responsible for all of the voting stations. Those tabulations, though go through the Central Counting. So in the video, Russell explains that there is voting fraud and there is election fraud. Voting fraud is when someone votes twice, doesn't sign, or they steal an identity. That happens at bottom left corner. ELECTION fraud is when the tabulation is fraudulently changed. That's what Russell is talking about. The fraud happens at the Central Counting section of the architecture.
@Lady Georgia There is a glitch in the MEE6 software. Your posts were not counted.
I know, just street cred lol
Your text was actually attributed to Biden. Sorry.
Lmao
#wronglyattributedpostgate
Hahaha I love this chat
So who here believes that some type of meaningful fraud took place and who here is opposed to that idea? Just want to get my bearing.
Define meaningful.
I do think there was fraud, as it's a question of probability.
@TaLoN132 is right. SCYTL is a "dashboard" program. Clarity Elections, SCYTL, GCR, VR Systems, Arikkan all have databases that MATCH the Central Counting database. The Tabulation occurs in Central Counting, and the rest of the systems follow in lock-step. These systems are responsible for reporting.
Enough to change the results of the elections from Trump to Biden
As you can see GCR displays in real-time to the Media (CNN, Fox, New York Times) all of the results from Central Counting.
I think individual instances of fraud are bad for the system and should be fixed and investigated, but as for the scale of it, I don't have enough evidence yet to lead me to think the results are in question.
@Maw, you just advanced to level 14!
From what I've seen, it's absolutely totally and definitively a certainty that I have no idea.
I'm all for transparency and recounts though.
I didn’t see the comparison chart , did you adjust for the Michigan and Minnesota mix up. Were they using the right data https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/526926-trump-lawyers-cited-minnesota-counties-in-affidavit-about-michigan-report @NoobDad
I'm on board with America Uncovered's synopsis.
I can think of little better ways to spend taxpayer funds than increasing public trust in the systems.
@james j I saw that, they made a mistake, but that has no bearing on the security analysis in the video - the one he is doing is in Dallas
@NoobDad, you just advanced to level 7!
@james j if you scroll up like half a page, you can see it. It's Dallas vs. San ANtonio
@linuxace I am convinced there was fraud. There can't not be. My problem is that all of these things that people 'know' for sure and would have had to escape recognition are being presented as obvious and/or previously known. It doesn't add up.
@james j it's from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&t=183s&has_verified=1&ab_channel=CDMedia
Honestly the whole let's-stop-counting-over-the-entire-weekend thing does spook me tho. Like a lot. And the potential for hacking is just so enormous. And the fact that electiom workers are documented to have been so un-tech-savvy they asked Dominion etc workers to basically run the machines remotely? Preeeetty crazy.
Alright so SCYTL owns Clarity Elections, which is based out of Barcelona.
The video is old, so it has given SCYTL an opportunity to address these concerns
@NoobDad That slide is very misleading and Ramsland explanation was not very convincing. The media organizations all have their own processes to collect the data from the states - sometimes down to the precinct level. Trying to derive anything from how it was presented on TV is not very scientific. You would logically think that it was all integrated, but it's not. In many cases, it is literally people making phone calls and manually entering numbers into the news organizations own database.
@TaLoN132 You literally see vote swaps on CNN... not one... but MULTIPLE times!
"Vote swaps"?
Seems to me based on my brief look at the data that MI, WI, and PA may have had meaningful fraud. Not sure about AZ, NV and GA. The data isn't as clear there. Limit that also to a handful of cities/precincts in the three suspect states. Maybe other explainations but it is concerning that eyewitness testimony validate strange happenings along with strange data.
yea, so as you can see the from the architecture, the Media data is updated in real-time
I would have thought there would be a training amd certification (competency) system for election workers, *with* the actual machines used, well before elections could take place. And a register of approved machines, make and model.
@Lady Georgia, you just advanced to level 2!
That's what I am telling you... It is not an integrated system. CNN does not have a connection to any system in MI. They are literally refreshing pages and manually typing what they find.