Message from @linuxace
Discord ID: 779747847527727114
@Lady Georgia, you just advanced to level 2!
That's what I am telling you... It is not an integrated system. CNN does not have a connection to any system in MI. They are literally refreshing pages and manually typing what they find.
This is a snippet from Russell's video above.
I understood that there was a datastream from Edison Research that most news agencies used.
https://www.edisonresearch.com/election-polling/ This is the data most news agencies were using.
I too think that evidence of election-affecting fraud is probably limited to the minimum number of states Trump needs to win.
(Including CNN)
674,508 - 673,948 = 560.... Bevin: 661,675 - 662,235 = -560
A SWAP of 560 votes
@NoobDad That line on Ramsland's (net very accurate chart) connecting to the media does not provide any indication on how that data is gathered. With all of the disparate systems, it is not automated. This is from several sources.
Suspicious, but I would have to know the technology and methods being used in ER data stream to say for certain that this is indication of fraud.
And there are multiple examples of this all over the internet, I just have to find them
If it were a fraud thing, CNN wouldn't be streaming it to the entire world ... that's the idea of fraud. You try to hide it...
No, cloud tech is HARD
All they have to do is wait for more votes to come in for Biden and slow the ones for Trump.
it's just configuring different systems, it's easy to mess up. Not everyone working on the architecture is a PHD genius. It's like saying every plumber is A+ all the time
Sometimes there are bad plumbers who do bad jobs, based on the security analysis, this is one of those cases
I would say it depends on who know about the fraud in that case. I've seen multiple examples of the votes changing in this stream and it could be indicative of fraud or just someone typing in the numbers and mixing them up. I haven't seen any information on how the processes to make any further determiniations.
@Lady Georgia The story is shifting from direct fraud to something more nebulous. That's not by accident.
@linuxace, you just advanced to level 2!
Yeah. CNN declaring stuff doesn't actually change anything so I don't think it proves anything. Maybe something to look into but nothing I would freak out about
No @Zuluzeit I'm just saying it's not hard to belive that these "mistakes" could be made, whether it's from an innocent developer or a frauding developer.
Except these aren't developers.
The ones setting up these systems are developers. The ones setting up the security, they're developers
These are people telling ER what the tallies are.
@NoobDad I gotchu, bro. It's just getting hard to navigate after the firehose of fake news for The last 2 weeks.
Then they're plugged into the system.
You can validate a portion of this architecture your self
Pre-certification.
And tallies change as they get certified.
notice "sos.ga.gov" It's servers hosted by state of Georgia.
It leaves the Georgia site and goes to ClarityElections servers
Now if you're in Chrome go to Developer Tools
I have several real world examples of systems that you might think are automated, but aren't or weren't until recently. You know the box office numbers that everyone sees to show how movies do each week... You would think that was all automated, but it isn't (unless it's changed in the last 5 years or so). In any case, for decades these numbers were gathered by a bank of about 40 phone operators that called 4k-5k theaters each night to get the preliminary numbers from the theater manager. They then used an algorithm to extrapolate and project the grosses for the rest of the 12k theaters. These numbers were used to initiate financial transactions between the theaters and the studios - as well as, helping to determine which movies to keep at the theaters The point is media companies do stuff like this all the time.