For the sake of truly investigating the data, I wonder if that was possible that it was a scheduled mail date

Makes sense.

I could buy into that but I would like to see it investigated to prove it either way

Either way, it's too easy to discard this as being likely to be "normal" and not shocking proof.

Agreed. Investigate everything!

If it has been there for that long, what does that mean about 2016? Is that why Trump disbanded his commission 2018 that spent 2 years trying to prove that fraud explained Clinton's popular vote win?

@GregInHouston2, you just advanced to level 2!

Didn't Trump's commission fail because the states refused to cooperate and the commission had no power to compel cooperation?

Was it already discussed about the witnesses video statements released yesterday? The dominion employee and such

Trump is dumb then, he shoulda payed more

😛

How are you saying this with such surety ?

I want to be this convinced

@GregInHouston2 Russ Ramsland was able to mount a fairly public investigation and was certain he could prove fraud. It would be really surprising if Pence and Kobach wasn't aware of the parallel investigation.

@Repeat Which ones are you referring to? The only one that I remember is Melissa Carone, but that was more than a week ago and that was thrown out of court, because she apparently lacked credibility.

@TaLoN132 https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breaking/michigan-voter-fraud-witness-statements/

@talon were there others as well?

@TaLoN132 please share a source about the lack of credibility. I apparently need to catch up

this tweet sounds to me like Trump is aware that Biden is likely to be POTUS

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1330364307335426051

thoughts?

@nachik it certainly can be interpreted that way

@Repeat Check out the copy of the court ruling in the following link, the judge's opinions of Ms Carone's testimony is on page 7. https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/michigan-judge-puts-the-kibosh-on-trump-supporters-conspiracy-theories-about-detroit/

@TaLoN132 thanks!

@Repeat, you just advanced to level 3!

@Repeat The only credible affidavit that I have seen is this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6Xq9i2dBlY

The case that included her affidavit was dismissed, though. For standing, I believe - the Lin Wood case.

https://www.ntd.com/georgia-poll-worker-says-she-found-pristine-batch-of-ballots-that-went-98-for-joe-biden_529959.html

I only have a few concerns about her account. First, why didn't she bring this to the attention to a supervisor or a Trump observer at the time? Why didn't she make note of the batch number id or something?

@TaLoN132, you just advanced to level 10!

Assuming all of that checks out, the only possible explanation is that maybe this was a stack of repaired ballots. If a ballot is too damaged to be read or maybe gets jammed at some point, I have read that there is a procedure for copying the vote to a pristine ballot so it can be counted. Since the Dominion system is new, she might not be aware of the procedure. The repair is supposed to be done with multiple observers ensuring the proper copying of the vote. It is possible that these repaired ballots are done at the end so as to not slow down the counting. This doesn't explain the 98% for Biden concern. Maybe someone was tired, lazy, or saw an opportunity to game the system for 30 or 40 addl Biden votes. Either way, it is concerning.

It seems likely that would have been a situation she would have encountered before if she had really been doing this for 20 years don't ya think?

I thought that too though.

Like I mentioned, it's a new system. She seemed to sound tentative and might have been brought in to help with the recount. She doesn't say.

So far I'm not convinced either way other than there was some strange stuff going on. All these claims needs to be investigated. The numbers are definitely strange.

They cut a lot of the testimony out also before posting it.

I've been reaching out to some of friends that are currently or prior DIA and they are very uncomfortable with what is going on. I haven't gotten any good statements or evidence from them, but they are pretty spooked with everything going on.

@linuxace, you just advanced to level 3!

Curious to know what was said between splices

Of all the people that have come forward, she seems the most believable to me. She just seemed sincere and did not embellish. She saw something very specific that bothers her. It might be nothing or limited, but it is the one that makes me pause.

Is it treason to make false statements?