@NoobDad, you just advanced to level 9!

Most of these places livestreamed the entire time.

Lol WI was 5x5 pixel

It was one camera view, low resolution

We aren’t privy to the evidence or lack of, as always. It has to play out

I've heard part of the strategy is to wait, go for a court victory that doesn't leave Biden with time for a countermove.

@GregInHouston2, you just advanced to level 6!

Even so, you would be probably be able to make out someone wheeling in a dolly with 250K prefilled in ballots... Or maybe in a little red wagon.

I still want to know what I get by advancing to a higher level!

"Prefilled" What other kind of ballots is an counting center going to get?

Prefilled illegal replacement ballots for Biden... As some have suggested.

Alan Dershowitz explained this route: https://youtu.be/Au0gTu6kj6Y

What really surprises me the most is how many people living in other countries come to our chats to impose their thoughts and opinions🤨

I don't think those were replacement ballots. But they could be prefilled in that they were printed filled in. I would love to see them pull the ballots were Biden and only Biden got a vote for analysis!

NOT EVEN CANADA USES THIS TRASH
https://twitter.com/ElectionsCan_E/status/1328449565096366083

Yeah... But they still have a queen. 😉

Maybe she would back off if they shared the Dom Perignon with her....

Another case that must be proven

Don’t think that will affect the presidential proceedings

I wonder if it might be time to revisit the reason why we can't verify that our votes registered as intended. Presumably, it's to maintain anonymity thus impeding people from selling their votes. It's the same reason that you can't take a picture of your ballot in the booth. However, that dynamic changes with mail-in voting. That is the only real way that people could cheat using mail-in ballots. I don't think either side talks about that because they don't want to give their opponents any ideas. This likelihood is extremely unlikely today with the technology today. All it would take is one person of integrity to play along get proof and expose the operation. That being said, I can't think of another reason why we shouldn't be allowed to log into our state's election server, use the vote identifier from our mail-in or in-person vote, and provide a unique, secret password that we set when registering to vote (or confirming our registration once this is implemented) and see the status of our vote, as well as, the actual tabulated values. This could be made even more secure with Public/Private key encryption or two-factor using our phones, etc. At some point, this could include an actual scan of our vote. This would prevent others from being able to access our vote information. We would have to ensure that the people with access to the vote data are not able to link the vote to each person. That way, they couldn't sell lists of the people who voted a certain way. In other words, election officials and voting systems would not be allowed to maintain a link between the voter and the vote. The vote would have an identifier that the voter would have to maintain. Theoretically, you could audit your vote through the entire process. I am already seeing the code in my head... Any thoughts? What am I missing?

People that were concerned that their votes were altered or not tabulated correctly could log in and verify them. If they find a discrepancy, they could call a hotline and report it. It would also be better than ID or signature verification. Complete, private transparency to provide checks and balances that we can all trust.

1 person did play along. That guy who recorded the snapchat in minnesota of the ballot harvesting scheme.

No body believes him. Why would you risk trying to do that yourself?

Nobody believes the USPS worker in Michigan

https://tenor.com/view/outta-here-gif-17855175

@TomWiliam += One Past Last Jedi, you just advanced to level 1!

this is trump right now 🤣

!rank

is this server a Mason ?

@DrSammyD Hey, Doc... Good Sunday. What do you think about personal vote auditing, though, as a concept? I see the "preventing vote buying" issue as a hurdle, but I am not sure that it is appreciably any different than what we have now.

@TaLoN132 voting system in US is not fear

should only count person vote, and who has more vote win, am I right?

Of course, I'm just trying to address the lack of trust. I'm a software architect/engineer, so I am wondering if there might be a way to use technology to overcome the trust deficit.

I am not talking about technology at all @TaLoN132

what do you call state vote? do you know what I mean?

@TaLoN132 Me too. I quit but that is my background. The problem is with closed software. Back in 2001, there were arguments for open source software but every state rejected that.

If we can all agree that our democracy would benefit from a system that gave the people the peace of mind in knowing that their vote was counted as intended and not flipped, coopted, altered, or nullified, we might be able to work together to make that happen.

Don't forget deluted.

Stick with fully auditable ballots. Use counting machines. Random sample audit the machines and random sample audit the ballots

My 2c