I just know your statement that "no widespread fraud has occurred" is impossible for you to _know_

@nachik for example, the talk about dominion executives and whatnot. They should have brought that stuff up pre-election.

All the votes are hand counted and add up, the machines have been forensically checked by a republican...what’s remains the issue?

hope I'm wrong but no State court will invalidate large amounts of votes on that argument alone - the other things are more systemic and widespread

there are like 100 other allegations

@nachik if the law requires poll watchers to be able to observe and examine the ballots, yet they were not allowed to do that, it makes sense that they should be invalidated.

there are republicans on the taking, Powell is right about that. GA procurement of Dominion machines involves Republicans. This makes the case hard. There should be no electronic voting anywhere.

@nachik I agree the courts might be reluctant because they are scared, but legally it makes sense.

it does but so far, it hasn't happened

I don't trust the courts so much

3 cases in court? After 49 being rejected? The kraken no longer in play with no evidence and no case logged in court regarding Dominion, what is one to believe?

not all the allegations are in court, and not all of them have to do with Dominion

it doesn't matter what one is to _believe_

How do you reply so that it is linked to the message you are responding to?^

you made a statement of fact

Most of the cases have been thrown out based on standing, not on the metrit of the evidence.

had you tempered it with "no sane person would believe..." it would be better

signatures.

Period

Check the signatures, and let it stand

@RobertGrulerEsq should clarify next time which cases come from where and what failed, because with all the noise we conflate big stuff with particular cases often lost because of lack of standing. Number of "cases lost" doesn't matter at all, if enough of the relevant issues are won.

I'd also like to say "CALLED IT" on Sydney Powell.

None of the cases have any affect on the outcome, yes American voting system has issues...but no evidence has been provided...anyone can make allegations and in return they’d be slapped with a slander or Harassment lawsuit. Trump can say these things because he is protected by the office. What protection does cindy the kraken have?

@DrSammyD what happened with Powell, all I saw was that blurb

She's no longer on the trump team.

Powell was allegedly fired

I still don't think she was ever hired so idk if fired works

She came up short on the goods.

@AdamS no anyone can make allegations without fear of defamation if they word it correctly, so I find that point moot

Because she has no evidence. So she is now useless to the cause

@AdamS but why are you asking me questions I agree with? All I am saying is that I _know_ that your statement _cannot_ be known by you.

I don’t think she was, I think she is working separate from the campaign like Lin Wood

@AdamS Yeah, I called that she didn't have the goods

Was trying to inject herself into this even though she has zero election law experience.

But The kraken never made the argument worded technically, she outright accused dominion and the democrats of mass fraud

@DrSammyD Powell never seemed credible to me either.

OK, fine, then how is she protected from defamation?

I would genuinely like to see something if it exists but if it doesn’t then move on

FYI defamation doesn't apply to groups, thanks Barnes

My legal knowledge is limited in the US and so are my discord skills. I’m new to the platform