oh awesome

@Whithers no there was just a acknowledgement that what he said was basically his own mind filling the blanks as he admitted. So he cannot attest to something he said he saw just what he thought he saw. That would be a more accurate and truthful position from his own perspective

@DrSammyD Barnes mentions Braynard

@realz For the same reason I know my Ex will spend more than she can acquire. I have watched it happen.

I am eagerly await Braynard's stuff

Yep

Braynard's work is on sampling.

this kind of surety is not contagious or convincing

you can't convince me by saying this

@james j You are incorrect. The FBI attempted to confuse and intimidate him and he then acknowledged he did not recant.

@Whithers, you just advanced to level 11!

@Whithers Again okeefe is the furthest from truth as you can get. Literally the most unbalanced partisan group out there and is funded by the Mercer family and works directly for the trump campaign. He only makes content for his audience in his bubble. No objective person can take his videos seriously

how did @Whithers get to level 11, that was fast!

lol

@realz You choosing not to observe truth is my problem in that the results will affect my life, but it is your issue.

I am not in his bubble, and I am unsure if I should take him seriously or not

you are both making statements I find to be lacking

If he was confused then he is slow or the most charitable just unsure. I believe IMO okeefe took advantage of that guy and got him to say something he wasn’t sure about in affidavit. He help d set up his go fund me and everything

@realz go watch more of his videos and see if what he claims is actually what is being presented

@james j To be a Leftist is to be a worshipper of the Lie. O'Keefe is not a Leftist.

potentially preparing a transition https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1331013907859845121

Look for cuts and stitched together dialogue @realz

I am referring to the videos I watch; I am very skeptical of O'keefe himself

It makes sense to look for that when he is doing an adversarial interview, but many of his interviews are not adversarial

(the USPS guy being the most recent example)

(he still cuts)

@Whithers I know he is a guy bought and paid by the Mercer family and works for the trump campaign. His whole goal is to make highly edited propaganda videos with zero actual facts

O'Keefe has been charged with editing for convenience before. It has never stuck as a factual accusation.

this shit isn't proof of anything, defamation suits almost always lose

using the court as his endorsement is POINTS OFF for me

@james j Having financial backing from the correct side does not make him wrong.

He also get's retractions out of court.

@realz like I said the ups guy was just someone who got paid to write affidavit. I’m sure he thought he saw something but after watching him in the interview it was clear he was just reporting what he thought he heard and not what he actually heard

@realz Almost always lose is different from ALWAYS have lost. Not one defamation suit lost in the history of Project Veritas.

And that is a lie.

This still doesn't prove anything to me except that you are repeating his weak sauce tagline

@Whithers it’s makes you biased , him being wrong is a separate issue. None of his videos can be used in court for anything.

A defamation lawsuit can’t be won if you don’t claim to be a source of factual information @Whithers

Thats the tucker Carlson defense

I want to know where the kraken is!?

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye