Message from @ImNotGas
Discord ID: 780591524413046786
GAH!
Braynard giving us all blue balls
https://rumble.com/vbas2t-smoking-gun-dominion-transferring-vote-ratios-between-precincts-in-pa.-by-e.html
"In this video you will see data from the NYT feed from PA on November fourth.
In this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day (see image link below):
https://ibb.co/h1x3Xds
A total of nine exhibits are presented in this video, but there are in fact several hundred of these precincts seizures and ratio transfers on the day of November 4th alone, and the same ratios continue to be transferred for several more days within the overall dataset spanning an entire week.
Original data sets:
https://gofile.io/d/qZcQl6
"The Dominion System isolated a "Flip Set" from the expected vote count and the expected percentage.
It then splices the Flip Set into multiple "ratio sets" and assigns them to precincts throughout the day.
Once a particular "ratio set" receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.
To hide it's trail, Dominion reassigns the same "ratio set" to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn't keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).
During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment)."
we're going to be blueballed until things hit real courts
@ImNotGas I don't think the courts will do anything. I just want to see the data to know for myself.
If this were true, there would be no USA. Democracy requires that the people decide who leads their government - there will always some people that will be disappointed. Any American that refuses to accept the legal outcome of an election is... well... by definition, un-American. I have read your opinions on the server and I find you to be a thoughtful person with strong, deep-held opinions. I hope you are just being hyperbolic. Our country is so much stronger when we have thoughtful people from every ideology sharing their viewpoints with a default assumption of mutual respect. One can hope...
No Whitepaper yet?
Not yet
I have yet to examine this
Yeah, again. Show me another city that doesn't have that happening.
Same as the Shiva analysis.
I'm not doing that again
that is a good litmus test
yea it seems like a lot of work heh
gah I'd rather continue writing my PDF scraper
As someone who makes a living working with data, I find these attempts to derive meaning out of media feeds a fools errand. The source data is suspect. There are very few automated data uploads from the states to the NYT Edison Research NEP data collection service, from what I can tell. I have been looking for how their data is collected. I was able to find how the AP collects theirs, which is going to be similar: https://www.ap.org/en-us/topics/politics/elections/counting-the-vote
@TaLoN132 I don't think that changes the analysis. Large Prime ratios transfers occurring shouldn't happen.
Has anyone been investigating the reasons behind so many different locations shutting down the voter count in the early morning hours. I have never seen that happen in any prior election over the past 40 years.
Given that it is a hodgepodge of manual calls to precincts, scraping of data from state election reporting sites, and a few automated feeds... By definition it is not going to be a 100% reliable data source. They then take the data that they are collecting from all these sources and feed them to their Media outlets. So, you are not looking at data uploads from states to NEP, you are looking at uploads from NEP to NYT.
@Talaire no one will investigate it, and they will say it was 'due to covid' or some other nonsense, the political class is happy with the rigging
@ImNotGas, you just advanced to level 2!
@ImNotGas don't you believe that there are any honest journalist left in the country who would want to get to the bottom of it? We have some good conservative voices who have investigative journalists.
Those ratio transfers would be hidden by the hodgepodge. They shouldn't appear because of the hodgepodge.
Everyone one of those vote tabulation centers claim that they never stopped and never sent anyone away claiming that they were not going to count. They assert that the delay in reporting totals was due to not being allowed to process or count the mail-in votes until the polls closed. Places like FL, TX, and CA were allowed to pre-process mail-in votes ahead of time. FL started counting the day before. They may have announced that tabulation would be slower because they were taking votes out of envelopes and flattening them out. It seems plausible and only indicates malfeasance if that is what one wants to believe.
@TaLoN132 Every news service that I looked at on election night said that several of these swing states announced that they were suspending the counting of votes.
I am talking about the pause that happened around 2am eastern time on election night
I remember when the election streams I was watching announced those too.
Not necessarily... it all depends on how they architected the interface. They have to determine certain transfer triggers. It is unreasonable to expect that a transfer will be triggered each time there is a single change in votes. My guess is that they used math to initiate data transfers. Because they used math based algorithm to initiate the data transfer, it will give the appearance of uniformity. To assume that this is proof of nefarious acts would be short sited. A thoughtful analyst would take these concerns and send an email to Edison Research asking what might cause this apparent uniformity in ratios. My guess is they have a programmer that would immediately recognize those numbers and could provide a reasonable explanation. Until someone takes that step, to assert it as proof of malfeasance makes me question their ability as a data analyst, because it is a short-sided, amateurish conclusion... And that is a professional opinion that I am actually qualified to make.
So am I...
So were the new agencies not informed correctly about what was happening at the tabulation centers?
@Talaire, you just advanced to level 1!
What news agencies?
@TaLoN132, you just advanced to level 16!
OAN, Newsmax, Fox, ABC that I remember ... could have been others too
No. That was announced by news agencies, and there are reports by the poll watchers they were told that counting was ending, and to go home.
I was watching various sources, too. None stated categorically that they were stopping the count. Some pointed out that there would be a slow down in the reporting because they were preparing the mail-in votes to be tabulated. Reporters often paraphrase what they think they heard. Unless we saw a press conference where election officials stated that all tabulation was being suspended, my guess is that reporters might be misreporting what was happening.
The vote tabulation center can claim whatever they want but GOP observers have testified to counting continuing without them.
If you add to it the fact that the numbers from these swing states didn't change for a few hours and then all of a sudden some big numbers were posted it adds credibility to the reports from the news agencies that the counting/reporting was suspended
Could it be that it was a ruse (sp?) to get the republican observers out of the tabulation centers so that they could no longer observe?
I have trying to read all of the court filings that I can... I must have missed those. Do you know which cases included these sworn statements? I would love to read them.