@Whithers I am aware of very little slang. Please advice?

Defending your territory does not count as murder, we have stand your ground laws all over the U.S.

@realz My foster brother is from Nayarit. He came into my family after my dad found him asa minor that had been left to bleed to death in an abandoned warehouse.

I guess that makes me foreigner adjacent.

@Jorgen Johnson Which is genius, as it removes the need for a Duke to provide security. One of the overlooked points of the 2nd amendment.

@Whithers context is that @Repeat blocks everyone who is a foreigner, or who argues with him/her

You probably blocked now

It is one way to protect your belief system.

@Doc Chino is an Hispanic term for the oriental features that occur when some one of African descent and someone of Native American descent have a child.

@Whithers I see. Thank you.

Doc was the first who was blocked, actually. @realz

I prefer to refer to people as Mr/Mrs[name] or the behavior/belief system group they insert themselves into. Such as Communist, abrahamite or nazi.

the latter, because it saves time.

It is also applied to saladitos for some reason: a kind of "candy"? of salt and chili powder cured apricots. My ex loves those.

It is very little use to discuss someone elses ideology.

Lmao 'foreigner ajacent' @realz

@Zuluzeit I tend to be the first. I am naturally curious, and one of my dependencies is curiosity into peoples cognitive dissonances. Which makes me a little sadistic, I suppose.

Well, then you will have to come up with something else for me since American Male Orthodox Christian Mystic is my group.

@Whithers makes you an abrahamite if I wanted to class you.

For this, it is a badge

Hahaha yeah I picked up on that somewhere @Doc

I doubt using that would save time.

Oh, for me it would. Based on your description, I know exactly where to expect a discussion between us to break down.. (edited)

Not completely. Unless Zarathishti are now considered Abrahamitic.

Zarathushti

So, what does Parler have in news today.

@Repeat it might be you are just engaging in confirmation bias. So far all the fraud cases trump has launched has resulted in nothing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39WrSskl3XE

From now on I choose who i allow to have influence over me. Absolutely fed up with outside influences trying to redirect my “best interests”. Tired of having to do my own research after watching CNN and the like. The only reason I watch the news is to get the facts quickly, like before leaving for work. But when the “facts” are only someone else’s opinion or false....It’s counterproductive to have to spend another 30 minutes researching whether or not what I have been told is true.

Except there aren't very many fraud cases Trump has launched. Not one yet, actually.

🤣 here we go again

What will you do to avoid confirmation bias @Repeat

Agreed. Screaming fraud from the rooftops isn't the same as bringing cases. It hits its mark just fine tho.

I sent this to Facebook awhile back.

So why not just start by doing research and skip the extra step of CNN

I am curious about one thing when it comes to fraud claims. If you believe that the election was stolen, what consequences do you see as a result?

Alleging fraud in public then not being able to argue it in court is a red flag. Just means you are putting on a show

Why is it that all the conspiracy people don't bring up Braynard

At least he seems above board and has some potential

Consequences are: 1) Our nation is over, ended, destroyed. 2) Civil War is justified with the election of our national enemies.

Civil war is always justified