Message from @William Dinan
Discord ID: 780918366029611008
but they vote to uphold the objection or not
Yes
That would be the entire House on Objections.
That would be in the New Congress.
House of objections seems like a good title
Unless there is some real Kracken. This looks like a Done Deal.
Its been an interesting term. Starting with cofefe and ending on kraken.
But 🍊🧍♂️🤬 amirite!
maybe the real term was the friends we made along the way?
I'm just watching people continue to eat their way through a pile of turds, expecting to trip across a Snickers which becomes less and less like it was ever there. It's almost like they have developed a taste for poo for its own sake.
@Zuluzeit Perfect! Enjoying the view is very good for your mental health!
Its why I invented the MANPMOFF
there will be a kraken we just have to weight a little longer
should I hold my breath?
That's exactly how you perform a disinfo campaign. I've said from the start signatures are where is at.
has anyone figured out what it takes to level up on this platform? no not unless you like suficating lol
@Jorgen Johnson Verbal diahreea
like me
Lmao MANPMOFF...now sold at Ikea
well, applied at the VA here. 🙂
it sounds like there is a lot of evidence they are keeping from the public
I remember when I was 12. Everyone had a moped. But it was at the summerhouse....
@Jorgen Johnson. That's called PR or Propaganda?
I mean, the idea of keeping evidence private as a tactical advantage is a very common thing in law.
But you think they'd offer the public something substantive.
if you read Robert Guler's book he explains why it is necessary to hide your argument from the opposition
They need to keep the crowd hyped while the band keeps them waiting.
@Jorgen Johnson Yeah, but not until the case is over. 😄
It usually comes out during discovery.
Hahaha keeping it from the courts too. Shrewd.
@Jorgen Johnson Unfortunately the Public Statements don't match the In Court Statements. That's called PR....
I trust those dots stand for 'opaganda'.
I do think we have to be way more skeptical of 'affidavits' floating around right now, as a lot of them aren't sworn affidavits (kinda defeating the purpose of having an affidavit)
(AKA: Not valid affidavits)
@Maw that is for Trial purposes. This has all been Injunction proceedings. Much different.
most of the lawsuits that have happened ae not from Trump's team so if the statements dont match than it is not the Trump team
Send me a pdf of a blank affidavit. I'll provide all the press release fodder you like and then some.
I dint think "trumps team" is a very well defined and static entity.