@realz no it's about this case did trump know he would have to file a court case against corruption after having speculated cases of fraud ^^

Firehose claims. Not unlike certain suits I've seen.

seems fishy

I have no idea

Trump first put it out there that’s there is fraud even before the election but also did nothing to make it more secure.

He just needed something to grasp to if he lost

If only someone who forecasted fraud were in a position to do something about it...at least to the degree that they seem to be claiming at this very moment.

Right

There is speculation that Emily informed him that with the certifications in MI, PA, and GA that Biden had become the likely winner and she had to start the process as prescribed by law. She gave him the chance to say it was his idea. It was the decent thing to do, I think.

ever since first day 90 minutes after inauguration he was target of impeacment for being corrupt I guess they forced him to think they're corrupt now it's Trump's fault ^^

I would think someone else is corrupt painting me black then telling me I stole the ink

Correct

You got it. I knew you'd come around.

not just once not just one media outlet every opportuity they got

spoongate?

I do like several scoops

@𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊 what did that have to do with what I said

Nothing. Firehose.

that weird truck parked next to his gold course being used as obstruction of justice ^^

here

Is biden keeping any of Trump's appointees?

He claims fraud for months and proceeds to do nothing about it @𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊

https://youtu.be/3iZ9JRVmJ5o

that he knew they'd make sure he wouldn't win ^^

the original is banned in my youtube ^^

Well there should be some strong evidence of that

There is none

well they are currently protected and they will be till he's already won ^^

unless you want to defame a poll watcher activly rigging a box

All trump did was to restrict voting by slowing down the post office that’s not helping election fraud but rather engaging in voter suppression

Well, speculative circumstantial evidence is a *kind* of evidence, to be fair.

is that a conspiracy i smell ^^

@𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊 then they would have argued that in court

No trump admitted it

@𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊

@james j

https://apnews.com/article/14a2ceda724623604cc8d8e5ab9890ed @𝕴𝖓𝖞𝖇𝖎𝖘𝕴𝖓𝖘𝖚𝖑𝖆𝖙𝖊

@james j let's wait on the DNI's Report required by Dec 6th? The EO Trump signed in 2018.

can you pull anything from this? ^^

it's like cut the questions and just pasted the answers it doesn't make sense ^^